1
$\begingroup$

My model is: $$Y=\beta_0+\beta_1X_1+\beta_2X_2+\beta_3X_3+\beta_4X_4.$$

I want to check if 'weather' (not included in the above model) is an appropriate instrument. $X_1$ represents price. If I determine that 'weather' is an appropriate instrument I will use my new model (which includes this instrument) to obtain the own price elasticity.

In order to check if an instrument is appropriate we run a first stage least squares regression. If we deem that the instrument is strong, we then run a two stage least squares regression (TSLS regression).

When running the first stage least squares regression, do we run $Y$ against 'weather' and look at if 'weather' is significant (or check the F-statistic to see if it is below/above $10$ as a rule of thumb), or do we run $X_1$ (price) against 'weather'?

Would I then do the same with the other variables? So, run $X_2$ against 'weather', etc.

Or should I include all the other variables in the regression? And then evaluate if the weather variable is significant? (So run, $Y$ against 'weather', $X_1$, $X_2$, $X_3$ and $X_4$, or run $X_1$ against 'weather', $X_2$, $X_3$ and $X_4$).

When running a TSLS regression, we test for $H_0:$ exogeneity and $H_1:$ endogeneity. When doing this, do we look at the J-statistic and multiply this value by the number of independent variables (here would be $4$)? And then compare to the chi-squared table of values with $4-1=3$ degrees of freedom?

Or, would it be much better to run a Durbin-Wu-Hausman (DWH) test? When I run this test on EViews, I obtain an output with J-statistics and p-values for 'restricted test equation', 'unrestricted test equation' and the difference in J-statistics. What do the 'restricted test equation' and 'unrestricted test equation' represent? If my p-values are not significant, would it be correct to conclude that we do not reject the null hypothesis and so the variables are exogenous and the instrument is not appropriate?

Lastly, does a Cragg-Donald F-statistic of value $5.0323$ signify that the instrument (weather) is weak? And which test provides more conclusive results? (Cragg-Donald, DWH or multiplying the J-statistic by number of instruments and comparing to the chi-squared tables)?

Thank you!

$\endgroup$

bumped to the homepage by Community 2 days ago

This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.

-1
$\begingroup$

For the first stage you want to run X1 (price) against its instrument (weather). The goal is to verify there is a sufficient correlation.

Then for the second stage you'll want to check that the F-statistic is e.g. > 10. You could also check the prediction power of the 2SLS (final) model with cross-validation.

Regarding other variables (X2 etc), are you interested in their causal effect or not ?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You have to look at the first stage F statistic of the excluded instruments (with one instrument that's the square of the t statistic of the instrument's coefficient in the first stage). The second stage F doesn't tell you anything. $\endgroup$ – Andy Feb 11 '16 at 10:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.