-1
$\begingroup$

Given a random vector $X\in\mathbb{R}^n$ with random scalar entries $X_i$, why isn't the covariance matrix $\Sigma$ of the random vector $X$ a dyad? In other words, why isn't the rank of the covariance matrix trivially 1?

$\endgroup$

closed as unclear what you're asking by Sycorax, Silverfish, gung, John, Sean Easter Feb 27 '16 at 3:56

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I'm not sure I understand what this question is premised on - why would this be trivial? Without knowing this, it's difficult to see what you would like to be explained to you $\endgroup$ – Silverfish Feb 26 '16 at 21:06
2
$\begingroup$

For the covariance matrix to have rank 1 all its columns must be the linear combinations of the first column. There's no reason why would random entries $X_i$ be perfectly correlated to each other unless you specifically made them to be correlated.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Your language may be confusing, because "perfectly correlated" would ordinarily be read as meaning all off-diagonal elements of the correlation matrix are $\pm 1$, which seems to be quite a different criterion than the covariance matrix having rank 1. I think you may be implicitly invoking a theorem here :-). $\endgroup$ – whuber Feb 26 '16 at 22:24
  • $\begingroup$ I can't think of other reason to have rank 1 correlation matrix than perfect correlation. I'm making up theorems like Fermat $\endgroup$ – Aksakal Feb 26 '16 at 22:43
  • $\begingroup$ Let's prove your theorem. Any rank-1 matrix has entries $(x_iy_j)$ for some vectors $(x_i)$ and $(y_j)$. If it's a covariance matrix, the corresponding correlation matrix has entries $(\pm\sqrt{|x_i y_j / (x_j y_i)|})$. Since that matrix is symmetric, squaring its entries and comparing to the transpose shows $$\frac{x_iy_j}{x_jy_i}=\frac{x_jy_i}{x_iy_j}$$ for all $i,j$. Since one side is the inverse of the other, each must be $\pm 1$. Therefore all the entries of the correlation matrix must be $\pm 1$, QED. $\endgroup$ – whuber Feb 26 '16 at 22:56

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.