My question is probably already answered somewhere but I did not find it.
In the standard linear regression model under the assumption that residuals are normally distributed, we have a result stronger than the Gauss-Markov theorem : $\hat{\beta}$ is efficient, that is to say has the smalles variance among all unbiased estimators. It can be shown by showing its variance is the one given by the Cramer-Rao bound.
But what can we say about the estimator of the variance of the residuals ? We know that it is
$$ \left(\hat{\sigma}^{OLS}_u\right)^2 = \frac{\hat{u}^T\hat{u}}{T-(k+1)} $$
And therefore $$ \mathbb{V}\left[\left(\hat{\sigma}^{OLS}_u\right)^2\right]=\frac{2\sigma^4_u}{T-(K+1)} $$ And we know that the Cramer Rao bound is $$ \frac{2\sigma^4_u}{T} $$ But as the ML estimator is not unbiased can we still conclude that the OLS estimator is not efficient ? I guess the answer is yes, but then is there an explicit efficient estimator of this variance, as the ML one is not (because it is biased) ?
Am I missing something ?