1
$\begingroup$

I am confused on how to calculate the beta in a probit/logit model

Probit Model $P(Y_i=1)=\Phi(X'\beta)$

Logit Model: $P(Y_i=1)=e^{X'\beta}/(1+e^{X'\beta})$

These formula's are great but how do I calculate the beta's in the model? What is a proper estimator for beta hat?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You are asking how we estimate $\beta$ given a set of data? This might be of interest: sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/… $\endgroup$ – jld Apr 5 '16 at 23:19
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ They don't have closed solutions except in a few specific cases, e.g. X is a binary variable: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/178584/… $\endgroup$ – P.Windridge Apr 10 '16 at 9:11
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ The title contains the most remarkable spelling of "probabilities" that has ever appeared on this site! $\endgroup$ – whuber Apr 10 '16 at 15:21
  • $\begingroup$ ^Ha! Thank you. I just noticed the typo. That is fascinating spelling. $\endgroup$ – jessica Apr 10 '16 at 16:44
  • $\begingroup$ Hi P.Windridge. Thanks for your answer. So according to your solution, you do have a closed form if the x is binary. If it is not your saying it has no closed form solution. Is there a manual/textbook that goes into detail in finding the numeric solution. What technique is being used. I am very fascinated by this problem. Thank you again. $\endgroup$ – jessica Apr 10 '16 at 18:43
3
+25
$\begingroup$

It is hard to answer your question, as you do not provide the background you have. Here is a general answer.


You want to find $\mathbb{P}[Y_i = 1 | X_i]$ when you have a bunch of data that comes from the same distribution, that is, the result ($Y_i$) is influenced the same way by the inputs ($X_i$) of each sample you have. Read more: I.I.D. (Wikipedia).

You know $X_i$ and $Y_i$ for your samples, and you want to find a function that maps the inputs to the outputs as close as possible. This is what the probit/logit models are doing, and they have a parameter $\beta$ to dictate the influence of the different input variables. To find the best $\beta$, we have first to define what the best is.

In linear regression models, the best model is often defined by the model that has the best $R^2$ measure with the output, or the one that has the smallest Mean Squared Error (Wikipedia). In classification tasks, a common measure is the Logistic loss (Wikipedia).

The value of the loss function is $L(y, f(x,\beta))$ where $L$ is the loss function, $x,y$ the input and output variables, and $\beta$ are the parameters of your model. It is a comparison of your model with the real result $y$, and gives you a metric to evaluate your model. You want to have the lowest error with respect to $\beta$, $$\hat{\beta} = \arg \min_{\beta} L(y,f(x,\beta))$$ Depending on your model and cost function, you can equate the derivative to 0 and compute the $\beta$ that makes it possible based on the data. In the case of the transformed models you are interested about, this is not possible, as as mentionned in the comments, no closed solution exists. However, you can come very close to the optimal solution by using gradient descent (Wikipedia). The idea is that the derivative of the function at a certain $\beta$ will point to the direction of highest increase in the cost function with respect to $\beta$, and if you go in the other direction, your $\beta$ will improve and the error will lower. As long as your cost function is convex, you will fill a global minimum, the optimal $\beta$.


How to find the parameters of the logistic regression is the introduction of a lot of books and classes in Machine learning. For a more specific answer, I'd advise looking at

You can also take a look at questions on a similar topic on CrossValidated,

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.