It does not matter for fitted values and residuals if we change the units of measurement of $X$. Consider transforming $X $ by some invertible $k\times k$ matrix $A$, $XA$ (e.g., change months of schooling to years and meters to centimeters when explaining wages).
This is seen as follows,
\begin{eqnarray*}
P_{XA}&:=&XA\bigl((XA)'XA\bigr)^{-1}(XA)'\\
&=&XA\bigl(A'X'XA\bigr)^{-1}A'X'\\
&=&XAA^{-1}(X'X)^{-1}(A')^{-1}A'X'\\
&=&P_{X}
\end{eqnarray*}
What about $\hat{\beta}$? Consider
\begin{eqnarray*}
\hat{\beta}^\circ&=&\bigl(\underbrace{A'X'}_{``X'"}\underbrace{XA}_{``X"}\bigr)^{-1}\underbrace{A'X'}_{``X'"}y\\
&=&A^{-1}(X'X)^{-1}(A')^{-1}A'X'y\\
&=&A^{-1}(X'X)^{-1}X'y\\
&=&A^{-1}\hat{\beta}
\end{eqnarray*}
That is, if
$$
A=\begin{pmatrix}
1/12&0\\
0&100
\end{pmatrix}\qquad\text{so that}\qquad A^{-1}=\begin{pmatrix}
12&0\\
0&1/100
\end{pmatrix}
$$
in the above example, the effect of a change in the regressors is, sensibly, adjusted accordingly.