I am confused about the terminology used when discussing the logistic GLM.

When dealing with any glm, we have that for the response $Y_i$:

$$ E(Y_i) = \mu_i $$ and $$ g(\mu_i)= x_i^T \beta = \eta_i $$

where $x_i^T$ is the transpose of a vector of covariates, and $\beta$ is a vector of parameters to be estimated.

Now, in the case of the logistic, we have that $Y_i$ is the number of successes in a population of $n_i$ with probability of success $\pi_i$, I understand that this implies $Y_i \sim Bin(n_i, \pi_i)$ we are then told that $$ logit(\pi_i) = x_i^T \beta $$ that is, the link function $g(x) = logit (x)$. But this is confusing, since $\mu_i = n_i \pi_i$.

So are we modelling $E(Y_i)$ here? or are we modelling $E(Y_i)/n_i$. This is particularly annoying as I am trying to find:

$$ \frac{\partial \eta_i }{\partial \mu_i} $$

edit Maybe I should explain more why I am confused. In the text by Dobson it states that the solution of the parameter vector $\beta$ using the Newton raphson algorithm is given as :

$$ X^T W X b^{(m)} = X^TWZ $$ where this specifices the $m$-th iteration of the estimate of $\beta$. Now, $W$ is defined as a square diagonal matrix with :

$$ w_{ii} = \frac{1}{Var(Y_i)} \left( \frac{\partial \mu_i}{\partial \eta_i}\right)^2 $$

Now, according to the wiki, we have that $$ Y_i \sim Bern(\pi_i) $$

This implies that $E(Y_i) = \mu_i = \pi_i$ and since logit$(\pi_i) = \eta_i$, we have that:

$$ \frac{\partial \mu_i}{\partial \eta_i} = \pi_i(1-\pi_i) $$

we also have that $Var(Y_i) = \pi_i (1- \pi_i)$. So then, the diagonal elements of $W$ are given as:

$$ w_{ii} = \pi_i ( 1- \pi_i) $$ but in equation 21 of the following source, the author states that the diagonal elements of $W$ should in fact be:

$$ w_{ii} = n_i\pi_i ( 1- \pi_i) $$

but this contradicts that $Y_i$ should be bernoulli..doesn't it?

  • $\begingroup$ $\pi_i=E[X_i]$ where $X_i$ is Bernoulli. $\endgroup$ – Alex R. May 27 '16 at 17:53
  • $\begingroup$ @AlexR. so $Y_i \sim Bern(\pi_i) $ and not binomial?.. $\endgroup$ – dimebucker91 May 27 '16 at 23:55
  • $\begingroup$ The point of a binomial is to estimate the physical frequency of your events. Afterall, how else would you calculate $\pi_i$? You can't just calculate it from a single coin toss. $\endgroup$ – Alex R. May 28 '16 at 0:45
  • $\begingroup$ I.E. you're estimating the success probability, given covariates $\endgroup$ – Alex R. May 28 '16 at 0:46
  • $\begingroup$ @AlexR. could you be more specific? I'm asking what the distribution of $Y$ is, and what then is $\mu_i$ in the context of the GLM... $\endgroup$ – dimebucker91 May 28 '16 at 6:12

let $Y_i$ be a Binomial random variable with success probability $\pi_i$ and size $n_i$ (note that a Bernoulli random variable is just a special case where $n_i=1$).

It is well known that $E(Y_i)=n_i \pi_i$ or that $\pi_i = E(Y_i/n_i)$ (this is important in the context of your comment).

Let us further assume that $\pi_i =E(Y_i/n_i) = x_i^T \beta$.

Having observed $c_i$ successes in an experiment we know that the likelihood function is $\mathcal{L}(\beta)=\prod_i \pi(\beta)^{c_i} (1-\pi(\beta))^{(n_i - {c_i})}$

Maximising this with respect to $\beta$ and computing the Fisher information matrix you cn find the results for two cases:

  1. $\forall i, n_i=1$ (and then $c_i \in \{0,1\}$), which is the Bernoulli case
  2. $\exists i, n_i>1$ , which is the Binomial case

So, for your ''confusion'' in your comment, if you have the Binomial case you do not work with $E(Y_i)$ but with $E(Y_i/n_i)$ (see supra and thus also with $g(E(Y_i/n_i))$

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ This makes things clearer, so then it is not really correct to say that for any GLM, we have that $g(\mu_i) =$ linear function? $\endgroup$ – dimebucker91 May 28 '16 at 11:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.