1
$\begingroup$

I would like to test the relationship between an ordinal variable (stress level, a ranking from 1 'not stressful' to 5 'very stressful') and a continuous scale (academic performance, CGPA). What correlation should I use?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

At least in psychology, it's common to use plain old Pearson correlation in this sort of situation, as part of the broader practice of treating ordinal rating scales as if they were interval-scaled. However, I'd recommend the Kendall correlation, which has a straightforward interpretation that only requires both variables to be on ordinal scales. As a bonus, Kendall correlation can handle nonlinearity, which poses a problem for Pearson correlation.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ +1. Any comment on Spearman vs. Kendall? $\endgroup$
    – amoeba
    May 30, 2016 at 20:47
  • $\begingroup$ I don't really see the appeal of Spearman over Kendall. It's easier to compute, and it's more readily comparable to the Pearson correlation. But it lacks the Kendall's nice interpretation as the rescaled probability of a randomly selected pair of rows being concordant or discordant. $\endgroup$ May 30, 2016 at 21:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.