Imagene we have a sequence of i.i.d random variables $(Y(t))_{1\le t\le s}$. It is possible to derive the density of $Y(t)$ and it is a function of parameters of interest $f(p,\rho, y(t))$. To have a Maximum-Likelihood estimator all i need to do is \begin{align*} \widehat{(p,\rho)}^{MLE}=\arg\max\limits_{p,\rho} \prod\limits_{t=1}^sf(p,\rho,y(t)) \end{align*} Sadly $Y(t)$ isn't directly observable. With a given dataset it is possible to construct MLE for realisation of $Y(t)$.

My question is: If $y(t)$ in above equation is replaced by $\widehat{y(t)}^{MLE}$, can the estimator above still be considered as a maximum-likelihood estimator?

I tend more to a "no" answer, but have no proof.

If it isn't MLE anymore, what about asymptotic normality? Hope at least this still usable.

  • $\begingroup$ How are you producing the MLE of y(t)? $\endgroup$ – Mark L. Stone Aug 17 '16 at 12:43
  • $\begingroup$ @MarkL.Stone hey, $Y(t)$ represents something like a probability of default. What i have is default dataset. I can prove that under certain assumptions MLS for y(t) will be number of defaults divided by total amount of credits given. $\endgroup$ – holic Aug 17 '16 at 12:57

The likelihood function you have is actually based on $f(p,\rho,\widehat{y(t)}^{MLE})$. Then, instead of having $Likelihood(p,\rho;Data)$, you have $Likelihood(p,\rho;SS)$, where $SS$ denotes a summary statistic which is the sequence $(\widehat{y(1)}^{MLE},\ldots,\widehat{y(s)}^{MLE})$. If the summary statistic $SS$ is sufficient, then the estimator is in fact the MLE. Otherwise, they are different.



There is an area that uses summary statistics to obtain inferences on the parameters called ABC:


| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ hey, thanks, but i dont think it works. Sufficient statistic means basicly that while using it, you dont lose any of important information you had before. So even if my estimator for $y(t)$ is sufficient, it is still just an estimate and not the true realisation. Maximum-Likelihood method is based on true realisations, if i got it correct. $\endgroup$ – holic Aug 17 '16 at 14:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.