3
$\begingroup$

This question already has an answer here:

When is is appropropriate to include or exclude the intercept from a regression model? SPSS provides this option in the GLM menu.

I am assessing group difference (gender) on tasks performed (X) and income earned (Y). In this case, if no task is performed, then no income is earned.

The SPSS guidelines states here:

"Include intercept in model. The intercept is usually included in the model. If you can assume that the data pass through the origin, you can exclude the intercept."

My stats knowledge is a bit rusty now but I remember my teacher saying that you should never exclude the intercept!

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by kjetil b halvorsen, John, Michael Chernick, mdewey, gung regression Sep 18 '17 at 14:25

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The question to ask is not whether $(0,0)$ lies on the curve ("no task performed, then no income is earned") but whether it lies on the extrapolation to the origin of the rest of the data. If not, then $(0,0)$ does not fit the model, so forcing the curve to go through it would be a mistake. By analogy, consider a person surveying the top of a cliff bordering the ocean. When they map the elevations, it would be foolish (and dangerous) to force the ground surface to meet the ocean (and thereby erase the cliff): people could get killed that way! $\endgroup$ – whuber Feb 24 '12 at 16:24
  • $\begingroup$ -1 because of the duplicate as referenced in onestop's comment. $\endgroup$ – Peter Ellis Feb 25 '12 at 0:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There are some GLMs in which having an intercept does not make sense even for lack-of-fit testing. The basic Bradley-Terry model is one example where we want to enforce the symmetry only attainable if we exclude the intercept. $\endgroup$ – cardinal Feb 26 '12 at 3:11
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks @whuber. As you pointed out, it is to do with extrapolation. In my case, there is no extrapolation beyond the origin. Am I thinking correctly here (statistically speaking!) $\endgroup$ – Amarald Feb 27 '12 at 1:39
  • $\begingroup$ Amarald, The issue is not whether you are extrapolating: it is whether you are confident that such an extrapolation ought to pass through the origin. In your case there is no apparent reason to suppose so and many possible reasons why it will not pass through the origin. Therefore, you probably should include a constant term in the model. $\endgroup$ – whuber Feb 27 '12 at 2:05

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.