# Is Conditional Logistic Regression Necessary for Analysis Following Matching?

I wanted to make sure that my approach to performing a matched case-control study is on the right track. I am looking at a group of patients who all underwent the same surgical procedure for a given disease. Initially logistic regression analysis was performed which found that there was an association between disease D and death following the procedure. I then created two groups, one with disease D (D+) and another without the disease (D-). This was done using coarsened exact matching (cem) via the MatchIt package in R. I matched the groups based on age, gender, race, income status, insurance type, and other comorbidities.

So now I have 2 groups (D+ and D-) with approximately 8000 patients total. I want to see if disease D, even after matching, is associated with post-procedure death. I have read that conditional logistic regression should be used in this case. My confusion stems from the fact that implementations in R for conditional logistic regression (e.g. clogit from the survival package) seem to be using cox regression (coxph). Why is this the case? Would it be incorrect to use unconditional logistic regression (e.g. glm) along with the weights created during matching? As an aside, why can't the chi-square test simply be used instead?