2
$\begingroup$

This question already has an answer here:

Does there exists a certain formal procedure one has to go through before being able to claim that no conjugate prior $p(\theta)$ exists for the given likelihood function $p(X | \theta)$?

In other words, how can one be sure that a conjugate prior is truly impossible to find, rather than that one has simply failed to do so due to a lack of experience or intuition?

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by Glen_b Oct 17 '16 at 10:04

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • $\begingroup$ This question stats.stackexchange.com/questions/59363/… is related to the point of being a duplicate, but it would be nice to get answer that goes a bit more into details than providing a link. $\endgroup$ – Erik Oct 17 '16 at 9:09
  • $\begingroup$ Also previously asked here: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/90969/… .. (but which is not answered). Not sure I follow the comment there though. $\endgroup$ – Glen_b Oct 17 '16 at 10:00
  • $\begingroup$ I closed as a duplicate of the post Erik mentioned, but if you can more clearly distinguish this one, it might stand alone. $\endgroup$ – Glen_b Oct 17 '16 at 10:05