1
$\begingroup$

I have been thinking about this for about 2 hours now and I don't see my error. In Time Series Analysis by Hamilton it is stated that the MLE of a normal distribution can be obtained by regarding the observed sample of size $n$ as a signle draw from the joint distribution. This intuitively clear since the ML estimation requires knowledge of the joint distribution. But now I came across this and I cannot explain it: Let $X_1,\dots, X_n$ be iid normal with mean $\mu$ and variance $\sigma^2$. The log likelihood function is given by $$\ell = -\frac{n}{2}\ln(2\pi) - \frac{n}{2}\ln(\sigma^2) + \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^n\left(\frac{x_i - \mu}{\sigma}\right)^2.$$ But if we consider the joint distribution (in log) which is given by $$\ell^* = -\frac{n}{2}\ln(2\pi) - \frac{1}{2}\ln(\det(\sigma^2\boldsymbol{I_n})) + \frac{1}{2}(\boldsymbol{x - \mu})'\sigma^{-2}\boldsymbol{I_n}(\boldsymbol{x-\mu})$$

we see that the middle term is different by the factor $n$ which leads to different MLEs for $\sigma^2$. What am I missing? I believe this observation has a simple explanation but I cant see it...

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Taking the determinant you get sigma square to the nth power times 1 since 1 is the determinant of the nxn identity matrix is 1. Now when taking the log the factor of n comes outside the log. $\endgroup$ – Michael Chernick Dec 27 '16 at 22:07
  • $\begingroup$ ok this was easier than expected... maybe I should refresh my linear algebra knowledge a little bit... Thank you! $\endgroup$ – Syd Dec 27 '16 at 22:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.