# Skew and Standard Deviation

I'm interested in classifying distributions with a high skew. Is it appropriate to say that just because a distribution has a high skew, does it have a large standard deviation?

• If I divide all values by $10^{100}$ most measures of skewness (such as the standardized third central moment) do not change, but the standard deviation becomes astronomically small. So either the answer is an obvious, emphatic "no" or else it depends on how you intend to measure "skewness": could you explain? – whuber Jan 5 '17 at 15:15

No.

Most simple example in excel: Skewness is equal in both cases, standard deviation highly different. Therefore it is not appropriate to say in general that high skew means large std.

Skewness is a direction in which a sample "leans" and does not depend on scaling, whereas standard deviation highly depends on scaling Further examples could be found where standard deviation is same, yet skewness is different.

Skewness (by any reasonable measure - and there are a number that are used) is a consequence of the shape of the distribution, not of its location or scale - you could add(/subtract) a constant to the random variable or multiply(/divide) by a constant, and it would not change how skewed the distribution was.

For example, the most common measure of skewness, the one based on the third moment, can be written as the third moment of a standardized variable: $E[(\frac{X-\mu_X}{\sigma_X})^3]$. If you rescale the variable ($Y = kX$) -- which changes the standard deviation by a factor of $k$ - you scale both the numerator and denominator in that fraction by the same scale, which then cancels: $\frac{Y-\mu_Y}{\sigma_Y} = \frac{kX-k\mu_X}{k\sigma_X} = \frac{X-\mu_X}{\sigma_X}$, and so the expectation of its cube is unchanged.

Similar cancellation occurs with other measures of skewness.