# A two-way interaction is not significant, but the correlation at one level is significant and not at the other level

I designed an experiment,in which there is one two-level categorical independent variable, and a continuous variable as a covariate. The interaction between the two is not significant, however, when I look at the correlation between covariate and dependent variable at each level of the categorical independent variable. The correlation is significant at one level, but not the other. This pattern shows up repeatedly when I use multiple experimental stimuli, and is consistent with my theory. So can I still interpret the result, even if the interaction effect itself is not significant?

To make it clearer, I know that a significant categorical by continuous interaction means that the slope of the continuous variable is different for one or more levels of the categorical variable.However, I am wondering whether the test for interaction effect takes the significance of the slope into account or not or it just test whether there's a significant difference between the two slope coefficients.

• When I review papers, and authors try to "let the data speak for itself" in this way, and argue that there are differential effects across groups, but don't actually test for them (i.e. testing for an interaction), I dinged them hard for this. Commented Jan 9, 2017 at 21:01
• You didn't really answer my question, but thank you. Commented Jan 9, 2017 at 21:11
• I literally did not answer your question. It was a comment. You're welcome. Regarding "I am wondering whether the test for interaction effect takes the significance of the slope into account or not or it just test whether there's a significant difference between the two slope coefficients." , it just tests whether the two slopes are different. Commented Jan 9, 2017 at 21:22
• Thanks. When I look at the simple slope, one is significant, and another is not. The non-significant slope would mean that this slope coefficient is no different from zero. Then doesn't that mean despite the significant interaction, the continuous independent variable has no effect on the dependent variable on one level of the categorical independent variable? Commented Jan 9, 2017 at 21:49
• The non-significant slope means that you can't say conclusively the slope is not 0. It does not mean it is no different from 0, Commented Jan 9, 2017 at 22:18