I was asked this question in an interview.
Let's say we have two Sharpe ratio's-
1) Sharpe of 3 computed over two years of data.
2) Sharpe of 2 computed over twelve years of data.
Is there a way to say quantitatively which one is better than the other?
I thought of using confidence intervals, using the fact that if the samples are from a normal distribution, then $\sqrt{n}$(sample mean - population mean)/Sample deviation is T student (n-1).
But then all we know is the Sharpe for the two years and twelve years. We don't have samples for yearly Sharpe to get a mean and variance, neither do we have the returns.
Can you please provide a general framework for solving these kinds of problems or any hint for the particular question?
I know i might be missing a few details, please feel free to make any assumptions to make the case simpler.