Jaccard similarity coefficient vs. Point-wise mutual information coefficient Can you explain the difference between the Jaccard similarity coefficient and the pointwise mutual information (PMI) measure? It would be great if you could add a few examples.
 A: To supplement the top answer:
You want high Jaccard similarity, if you care about whether the two items co-occur frequently.
You want high PMI, if you care about how bigger than random the chances that the two items co-occur.
For two items with low probabilities and moderate co-occurrence, Jaccard will have really low scores, while PMI could give high scores.
A: These two are quite different. Still, let us try to "bring them to a common denominator", to see the difference. Both Jaccard and PMI could be extended to a continuous data case, but we'll observe the primeval binary data case.
Using a,b,c,d convention of the 4-fold table, as here,
               Y
             1   0
            -------
        1  | a | b |
     X      -------
        0  | c | d |
            -------
a = number of cases on which both X and Y are 1
b = number of cases where X is 1 and Y is 0
c = number of cases where X is 0 and Y is 1
d = number of cases where X and Y are 0
a+b+c+d = n, the number of cases.

we know that $\text{Jaccard}[X,Y]= \frac {a}{a+b+c}$.
PMI by Wikipedia definition is $\text{PMI}[X,Y]= \text{log}\frac {P(X,Y)}{P(X)P(Y)}$.
Let us first forget about "log" - because Jaccard implies no logarithming. Then plug a,b,c,d notation into PMI formula to obtain:
$$\frac {P(X = 1,Y = 1)}{P(X = 1)P(Y = 1)} = \frac{a/n}{\frac{a+b}{n}\frac{a+c}{n}} = \frac{an}{(a+b)(a+c)} = \frac{\frac{a}{\sqrt{(a+b)(a+c)}}}{\sqrt{\frac{a+b}{n}\frac{a+c}{n}}} = \frac{\text{Ochiai}[X,Y]}{\text{gm}[P(X),P(Y)]}$$
where "gm" is geometric mean of the two probabilities, and Ochiai similarity between X and Y vectors is just another name for cosine similarity in case of binary data: $\sqrt {\frac{a}{a+b}  \frac{a}{a+c}}$.
So, you can see that PMI (without logarithm) is Ochiai coefficient further "normalized" (or I'd say, de-normalized) by the overall probability of the two-way positive (eventful) data.
But Jaccard and Ochiai are comparable. Both are association measures ranging from 0 to 1. They differ in the accents they put on the potential discrepancy between frequencies $b$ and $c$. I've described it in the answer "Ochiai" above links to. To cite:

Because product (seen in Ochiai) increases weaker than sum (seen in
  Jaccard) when only one of the terms grows, Ochiai will be really high
  only if both of the two proportions (probabilities) are high, which
  implies that to be considered similar by Ochiai the two vectors must
  share the great shares of their attributes/elements. In short,
  Ochiai curbs similarity if b and c are unequal. Jaccard does
  not.

