1
$\begingroup$

Let $X_1 \cdots X_n$ be a random sample from a distribution $f(x) = e^{-(x-\theta)}, x>\theta, -\infty<\theta<\infty$. Let $Y_1 = \rm{min}\{X_1 \cdots X_n\}$.

Is $Y_1$ unbiased for $\theta$?

I'm stuck on finding the expected value of $Y_1$. I have the pdf as $f_{Y_1}(y) = n e^{-n(y-\theta)}$, but cannot find the integral $\int_\theta^\infty y n e^{-n(y-\theta)}$. I believe that integral is correct, but it appears to be undefined. Any idea where I may have gone wrong?

$\endgroup$
7
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You could try integration by parts. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 15, 2017 at 20:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $f(x)$ is not a valid density except for $\theta =0$. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 15, 2017 at 20:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Sorry, I meant $x>\theta $. Fixed it above. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 15, 2017 at 20:50
  • $\begingroup$ Integration by parts does not yield a defined answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 15, 2017 at 20:50
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @honeyBunchesOfFloats What if you have sample of size 1? Try to calculate expected value in this simple case. Your integral can be calculated by parts $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 15, 2017 at 22:26

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Posting an answer as it looks like-based on comments-the OP solved the problem. Let $y$ denote the minimum order statistic.

Take out the constant term to get:

$ne^{n\theta} \int_\theta^\infty ye^{-ny}dy$.

Then, integration by parts once gives you:

$ne^{n\theta}\left[\frac{\theta e^{-n\theta} }{n} + \frac{1}{n}\int_\theta^\infty e^{-ny}dy\right]$.

Note: the first term will give you a $ye^{-ny}$ term evaluated from $\theta$ to $\infty$, the limit as $y \to \infty$ is 0, you can check this by applying l'hospital's rule. Then integrate this second integral to get:

$ne^{n\theta}\left[\frac{\theta e^{-n\theta} }{n} + \frac{e^{-ny}}{n^2} \right]$.

Simplifying this expression gives:

$\theta + \frac{1}{n}$.

This indicates the estimator of $\theta$ is biased but is asymptotically unbiased. Alternately, you would know the value of $n$ (your sample size), so you could make the estimator unbiased by subtracting $\frac{1}{n}$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.