Statistical language in "The Avengers" In the Marvel Movie "The Avengers," there's a scene in which Bruce Banner, looking for a piece of alien technology called the "tesseract," says that he is going to "rough out a tracking algorithm, just a basic cluster recognition." Is this a coherent thing to say? I'm a novice in statistics, but I have heard of cluster analysis and pattern recognition. Is cluster recognition used to refer to the same thing and what relation does it have to tracking algorithms? (Or did Bruce Banner lie?)
transcript from the movie

Phil Coulson
We're sweeping every wirelessly accessible camera on the planet. Cell phones, laptops... If it's connected to a satellite, it's eyes and ears for us.
Natasha (Black Widow)
That's still not gonna find them in time.
Dr. Banner (The Hulk)
You have to narrow your field. How many spectrometers do you have access to?
Nick Fury
How many are there?
Dr. Banner (The Hulk)
Call every lab you know. Tell them to put the spectrometers on the roof and calibrate them for gamma rays. I'll rough out a tracking algorithm, basic cluster recognition. At least we could rule out a few places. Do you have somewhere for me to work?

More info about the tesseract (E.g. it emits gamma radiation)
 A: To "recognise" something it must first exist, so you will be using a supervised algorithm while clustering is an unsupervised class of machine learning methods. Clustering algorithms group in terms of similarity, rather then recognize known patterns. So I'd say it sounds like another example where there is less science and more fiction in the movies and where unrelated geeky terms are used in random combination to sound scientific...
A: Clusters of detected gamma photons are being studied in order to find potential sources of gamma rays
The cube or tesseract is emitting gamma radiation. In order to find sources of gamma radiation (and thus a potential location of the tesseract) one can use algorithms to detect clusters in the detected locations of gamma radiation.
Note that the estimated locations/directions of the observed photons are not so accurate, with error, so statistics comes into play. Whenever the detected photons are a lot near each other then this may indicate that they are related to a source radiating gamma photons.
Finding clusters of gamma rays is a way to find out whether a detected gamma ray is background or belongs, along with other detected gamma rays, to some potential common source.
Astronomers have been using the minimal spanning tree algorithm to find clusters of (ptentially) associated detected gamma rays( see for instance: Campana 2008  ).

An example image of how this works
An example image of how this works can be generated with the R statistical software (see below):
It is a similar image as those found in the works (but I can not find an image with clear free license):

*

*Campana, R., et al. "Minimal spanning tree algorithm for γ-ray source detection in sparse photon images: cluster parameters and selection strategies." Astrophysics and Space Science 347.1 (2013): 169-182.
link to axiv paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2025


*Campana, Riccardo, et al. "A Minimal Spanning Tree algorithm for source detection in γ-ray images." Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 383.3 (2008): 1166-1174. link to journal

library(emstreeR)

## 2D artifical data
set.seed(1)
n <- 20
n2 <- 400-n*3
## c1 to c3 are artificial clusters
## c4 is background noise
c1 <- data.frame(y = rnorm(n, 45, sd = 1),
                 x = rnorm(n, 130, sd = 1))
c2 <- data.frame(y = rnorm(n, 50, sd = 1),
                 x = rnorm(n, 125, sd = 1))
c3 <- data.frame(y = rnorm(n, 55, sd = 1),
                 x = rnorm(n, 135, sd = 1))
c4 <- data.frame(y = runif(n2, 40,60),
                 x = runif(n2, 120,150))
d <- rbind(c1, c2, c3, c4)

## MST:
out <- ComputeMST(d)

## 2D plot of points:
plot(-100,-100,xlim = c(120,150), ylim = c(40,60), xlab="latitude", ylab="longitude")
points(out$x,out$y,
       pch = 21, col = 1, bg = 1, cex=0.4)
title("approximate spatial distribution \n of detected signals", cex.main=1)

plot(-100,-100,xlim = c(120,150), ylim = c(40,60), xlab="latitude", ylab="longitude")
points(out$x,out$y,
       pch = 21, col = 1, bg = 1, cex=0.4)
title("red  lines: small edges \n green dots: connected with n >= 10", cex.main = 1)

# draw clusters seperately with large size

library(igraph)
edgevector <- as.numeric(matrix(cbind(out$from[edgeselect],out$to[edgeselect]),2,byrow=TRUE))
graph <- make_graph(edgevector, directed = FALSE)

groepen <- groups(components(graph))
sizes <- which(components(graph)$csize>=10)

for (s in sizes) {
  coordinates <- unlist(groepen[s])
  points(out$x[coordinates],
         out$y[coordinates],col=3)
}


# draw the tree and use mean distance as boundaries between clusters
boundary = mean(out$distance)
edgeselect = out$distance<boundary
colors = rgb(0.75+edgeselect*0.25,
             0.75-edgeselect*0.75,
             0.75-edgeselect*0.75)
for (i in 1:400) {
  lines(c(out$x[out$from[i]],out$x[out$to[i]]),
        c(out$y[out$from[i]],out$y[out$to[i]]), 
        col = colors[i])
}

A: this is so funny. I was re-watching the Avengers and heard Banner say that. I have been learning ML for the past year, so I was wondering if anyone else caught that.
Clustering analysis is the process of minimizing distance between data points and maximizing centroids (clusters). As Tim suggested, this is unsupervised learning so there is no 'target/known variable'. 
To answer your question, I think it is indeed a coherent thing to say. I'm assuming a clustering algo can be created to analyze certain variable including the gamma radiation these labs pick up over time. I'm also assuming that the readings may fluctuate, even if the cube is not near it. With readings of multiple labs, the cluster algorithm can cluster labs together that had elevated readings at certain times. To track and perhaps look at movement of the tessaract. To ,at least, narrow down the search of where it has been or where it is. This I'm assuming would be part of the algorithm. Afterward may be a search of the cellphones/laptops etc. that Fury had mentioned in that area, or other anomalies in the area (crazy deaths due to loki, missing/stolen item/reports of the materials loki was after, location of reactors etc.).
