I'm surveying a population of student in a university, and due to distance and time issues, I cannot go to every campus to survey everybody. This is why I have decided to do an online survey. So I got two options:

  1. I send an open invitation for every (or at least 99%) of the students, thus having the self-selection bias.
  2. I randomly pick everyone from a list and try to reach them through alternative means (like Facebook, e-mail, etc).

For option 1, I'll easily get a larger sample size (I guess around 400); for option 2, I believe I can reach a way shorter sample size (I guess around 100). I'm estimating according to the time I have.

So, in a 95% confidence level I could get a margin of error smaller than 5% in option 1, and around 10% in option 2. But in option 2 I won't have self-selection bias.

What option is the best? And why? Does anyone recommend me anything in a reliable literature source?

  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to stats.SE! Please take a moment to view our tour. You will end up with a sample either way. With that in mind, what attributes are most important to you from your survey respondents? $\endgroup$
    – Tavrock
    Commented Mar 1, 2017 at 18:15
  • $\begingroup$ Hey @Tavrock, as I'm surveying them about some preferences, I think the survey respondents must be the most representative of the whole population as possible. I believe non observable attributes might influence the answers, and this is why I actually think the probabilistic one is better (but I'm not sure). Anyway, I need references to the literature to write the foundations of my choice. $\endgroup$
    – Ágatha
    Commented Mar 1, 2017 at 19:01


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.