Suppose we have the following count data:

|   X   | Freq |
|   0   |  18  |  
|   1   |  32  |  
|   2   |  17  |
|   3   |  10  |
|   4   |   5  |
|   5   |   2  |
| TOTAL |  84  |

We want to construct a likelihood ratio test to see if a Poisson distribution is suitable to describe the data. The likelihood and log-likelihood equations for a Poisson distribution are:

$$ L(\lambda) = \prod_{y=1}^{84} \frac{e^{-\lambda}\lambda^y}{y!} $$

$$ l(\lambda) = \sum_{y=1}^{84}\bigg(-\lambda + ylog(\lambda) - log(y!) \bigg)$$

We can solve for the MLE $\hat{\lambda}$ as follows:

$$ \frac{dl(\lambda)}{d\lambda} = \sum_{y=1}^{84}\bigg(-1 + \frac{y}{\lambda}\bigg) = 0 \rightarrow \hat{\lambda} = \frac{\sum_{y=1}^{84}y}{84} = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{84}x_i f_i}{84} = \frac{126}{84} = 1.5 $$

The alternative hypothesis is that the data follow a multinomial distribution. The likelihood and log-likelihood equations for a Poisson distribution are:

$$ L(p_0,p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4,p_5) = {n\choose{f_0,f_1,f_2,f_3,f_4,f_5}} p_0^{f_0} p_1^{f_1} p_2^{f_2} \pi_3^{f_3} p_4^{f_4} p_5^{f_5} $$

$$ l(p_0,p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4,p_5) = log{n\choose{f_0,f_1,f_2,f_3,f_4,f_5}} + \sum_{i=0}^{5} f_i \times log(p_i) $$

Using the method of Lagrange Multipliers (with constraint $\sum_{i=0}^{5} p_i = 1$), it can be shown that the MLE's $\hat{p_i}$ are equal to:

$$ \hat{p_i} = \frac{f_i}{n} $$

I know that the likelihood ratio statistic is defined as $ D = -2(l_0 - l_A) \sim \chi_{(6-1)-1}^2 \sim \chi_4^2$, where $l_A = l(p_0,p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4,p_5)$, i.e. the log-likelihood equation for the multinomial distribution.

However, I am not sure what $l_0$ should be. Do I assume that the distribution of the null hypothesis follows a multinomial distribution with $p_i$ ~ Poisson (Case 1), or do I assume that the null hypothesis follows Poisson distribution (Case 2)? I've tried both and I do not get the same answer.

Case 1: $ l_0 = log{n\choose{f_0,f_1,f_2,f_3,f_4,f_5}} + \sum_{i=0}^{5} f_i \times log\bigg(\frac{e^{-\hat{\lambda}}\hat{\lambda}^i}{i!}\bigg) $

Case 2: $ l_0 = \sum_{y=1}^{84}\bigg(-\lambda + ylog(\lambda) - log(y!) \bigg) $


1 Answer 1


You seem to be using the generalised likelihood ratio test. However, this only works when the alternative hypothesis is a more general version of the null hypothesis, for example when the null hypothesis is that $\lambda = 1$ and the alternative hypothesis is that $\lambda$ is unconstrained (can be anything but 1). Since you're testing Poisson against multinomial, the generalised LRT doesn't really work.

You can still use a chi-squared test to conduct a chi-squared test of goodness of fit, but replace the alternative hypothesis with 'The data do not follow the Poisson distribution'. Here, the chi-squared test statistic $\chi^2 = \sum_{i}\frac{O_i- E_i}{E_i}$ roughly follows the $\chi^2_{6-1-1}$ distribution for large $n$ (where $O_i$ and $E_i$ refer to the observed and expected values of the frequency in the i-th bin).*

Also, I think that if you know the source of the data, you should know whether Poisson or multinomial is appropriate, since they're applied to quite different situations.

*Technically, Pearson's chi-squared test is an approximation of the generalised likelihood ratio test, so you'd still be using that (in a sense).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.