I have read that Cross-loadings of below .3 are often ignored! Can I have some reliable references to back this up please?

I have read exisiting work and authors tend to make this decision without supporting their decision!


A factor loading of $0.30$ means that approximately $10$% of the variance in the indicator is explained by the factor (i.e., $0.30^2=0.09$). Loadings lower than this are often considered unreliable or unimportant. The extent to which model fit is affected by constraining such loadings to $0.00$ can be explored using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). I wouldn't call this approach "ignoring" them but maybe you had a different approach in mind. If so, please clarify in the question.

Edit: In the comments below, I provide some possible citations. Since you seem to want a more empirical treatment of this issue, I recommend Peterson (2000).

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Jeffrey. You are absolytely right in saying that. However, when I tried to find a reliable source / reference for citation in my work - It wasn't easy. Can you give a reference or two that I can cite please? $\endgroup$ – M Rickaby Mar 20 '17 at 14:37
  • $\begingroup$ It's hard because this is more of a scientific convention than a rule or law. However, you can cite that this convention has been in use for a very long time indeed: Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. $\endgroup$ – Jeffrey Girard Mar 20 '17 at 14:47
  • $\begingroup$ Also very relevant: Peterson, R. A. (2000). A meta-analysis of variance accounted for and factor loadings in exploratory factor analysis. Marketing Letters, 11(3), 261–275. $\endgroup$ – Jeffrey Girard Mar 20 '17 at 14:50
  • $\begingroup$ "[I]t seems from the general literature in the social and behavioral sciences that [a threshold factor loading of] 0.30 [is the minimum that is traditionally used when deciding to] accept an item or variable as belonging to a factor or component" -- (p. 160). Merenda, Peter F. (1997). "A Guide to the Proper Use of Factor Analysis in the Conduct and Reporting of Research: Pitfalls to Avoid," Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 30, 156-164. $\endgroup$ – Jeffrey Girard Mar 20 '17 at 14:53
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much. That was exactly what I was keen to get hold of. $\endgroup$ – M Rickaby Mar 20 '17 at 15:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.