We have a new observation $x_0$, whose response will be $Y_0 = \beta_0+\beta_1x_0+\epsilon_0$. We want to predict $Y_0$.
The estimator that we use is $\hat{Y}_0 = \hat{\beta}_0+\hat{\beta}_1x_0$.
The books goes on finding $E[\hat{Y}_0-Y_0]=0$ and $var[\hat{Y}_0-Y_0]=\sigma^2(1+h_{00})$. Also it says that since $Y_0$ is a random variable and it is normally distributed, we know that we can write $$0.95 = P\left(-c_1 < \frac{\hat{Y}_0 - Y_0}{\hat{\sigma} (1+h_{00})} < c_2 \right)$$ and then goes on finding the prediction interval.
So a couple of my questions are:
- How do we know $Y_0$ is normally distributed? But more importantly, how do we know it is a random variable?
- if $Y_0$ is a random variable, then why the responses $Y_i = \beta_0+\beta_1x_i+\epsilon_i$ are not treated as random variables? (or are they?)
- Finally, if $Y_0$ and $Y_i$ are treated in the same way, i.e. they have the same distribution, how come their estimators $\hat{Y}_0 \equiv \hat{\beta}_0+\hat{\beta_1}x_0$ and $\hat{Y}_i \equiv \hat{\beta}_0+\hat{\beta_1}x_i$ are not the same thing?