What Method / Tool Will Help Me Choose The Dice I Need To Fit Particular Specs?

BACKGROUND: I am designing a roleplaying game ("RPG.") I have been researching, and know some basics of probability and the normal distribution, including the equation to generate a standard bell curve.

Most RPG's use "polyhedral dice" of different denominations --- commonly ones with 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 20 faces (usually numbered from 1 to the number of faces) --- in order to determine whether or not the character a player is "roleplaying" in the game succeeds or fails in an attempted task.

These polyhedral dice are often added together in varying denominations (e.g. summing three six-sided dice or two ten-sided dice + one eight-sided die), to give a particular range of values and a particular mean with a more-or-less bell curve-shaped distribution of probabilities. In RPG's a roll adding together 'X' dice rolls of a die with 'Y' faces is denoted "XdY" --- so a roll of two ten-sided dice + one eight-sided die would be written as "2d10 + 1d8."

Strategies which I know can help one obtain results with particular desired distributional characteristics, with the curve of results shifted entire &/or skewed or 'squeezed' up or down the x- &/or y-axes, include...

1. changing the number &/or denomination of dice rolled. (E.g. 4d6 ---> 6d4)
2. using mathematical operations - add / subtract / multiply / divide (etc.) (E.g. 5d8 ---> 5d8 - 3; 6d10 ---> 6d10 / 3)
3. keeping and adding together only 'N' dice results from the total number of dice rolled (the "dice pool") : these may be the N lowest or highest dice results. This method can be used to raise or lower the mean or variance of a probability curve --- or indeed alter both in different combinations. (E.g. "Roll 8d12." ---> "Roll 8d12, then add together the results from 3 of the dice rolled."; "Roll 10d20." ---> "Roll 10d20, then add together the 3 highest results rolled.")

I particularly prefer modifying a probability curve by keeping and adding the N lowest or highest rolls from a dice pool : I'm still working on an issue when it comes to picking lowest rolls, but keeping highest rolls nicely skews a bell-like probability curve to the right of the x-axis, raising the mean but tightening (lowering) the variance, as I desire.

QUESTION: If I have a probability curve of results with a bell-like shape and particular minimum, maximum, mean and variance values which I want to generate, is there some formula / method / tool to figure out which particular combinations of dice and numbers will generate what I want (or workably close enough to) using e.g. strategies like those I've noted above? (I'm not interested in other, more complicated ways of altering dice results like "exploding" dice, or "keep all dice rolled except the lowest" unless they prove necessary.)

EXAMPLES:

1. I wish to generate a bell or bell-like curve with results from 0 to 50 --- with (as usual in a proper bell-curve) a mean equal to its median and mode midway on the x-axis, but the same variance as the curve generated by "3d100 / 3."

2. I wish to generate a bell or bell-like curve with results from 0 to 150 --- with (as usual in a proper bell-curve) a mean equal to its median and mode midway on the x-axis, but the same variance as the curve generated by "3d100 / 3."

3. Let's say I am playing a character in an RPG and I roll "3d100 / 3", with the output representing the result of my attempt to perform a particular task by rolling a specified target number or higher.

Now sometimes this roll should be modified to reflect the fact that my character's task is being made easier or harder due to positive or negative environmental factors at the time.

I can represent the effects of positive factors by rolling instead 4d10, then keeping only the highest 3, and dividing whatever this comes to by 3; I might write this as "(the 3 highest dice of 4d10)/3." The curve describing the output here is nicely skewed right, raising the mean but lowering the variance - exactly what I want.

But how do I represent the effects of negative factors making the task at hand harder? Here I want to skew the curve of results left, lowering the mean but raising the variance. However if I try 'flipping' what I did with the right-skewed curve above by rolling 4d10, then keeping only the LOWEST 3, and dividing whatever this comes to by 3 - i.e. "(the 3 lowest dice of 4d10)/3" - the mean does naturally lower, but the variance naturally lowers too...and without a specific method or tool to generate dice curves with the values I have chosen for me, I have been unable to find a way of avoiding this inverse relationship between left-skewed curves' mean and variance.

I really appreciate your help.

• You might get better answers at RPG.SE. – S. Kolassa - Reinstate Monica Apr 25 '17 at 11:53
• LOL - I followed the advice of commenters to another user pursuing similar questions to this SE page...I've already exhausted the RPG / RPG Design SE pages. – cre8vnova Apr 25 '17 at 11:56
• A "what method" question is on topic, but I think that as it is presently phrased the question may be too broad for our format and most of our users won't necessarily follow all of what you said (we're not all roleplayers.). We have several posts on site dealing with dice related questions that will be of some value; you should review those. Note that the "method" will tend to be different for different circumstances and it might be better to choose some specific examples to begin with and ask about those. – Glen_b -Reinstate Monica Apr 27 '17 at 17:03
• It's not clear what the scope of solutions to be covered might include - e.g. whether you're including things like "exploding" dice and "roll 4 leave out the smallest". You should explicitly list out what you want to include, though it may be more productive in the first instance to start with a pretty short list (so the question doesn't close as too broad). After each such item you'll need to clearly explain how it works (a phrase like "dividing constants and/or variables" is not clear ... what's varying there? ... you need to explain the mechanic in detail). – Glen_b -Reinstate Monica Apr 27 '17 at 17:05
• I have made some edits to simplify your question, to give you a better sense of what kind of thing might work on our site; I'll then put it on hold so you can edit to get closer to what you need. You can roll it back to what you posted (if you can't figure out how, ask) if you wish but either way you'll still need to edit to simplify in some similar fashion, and then explain in more detail for each thing you add. – Glen_b -Reinstate Monica Apr 27 '17 at 17:10