1
$\begingroup$

I am using GAMLSS. The data looks like this: enter image description here

So, I tried a zero-inflated beta model (beta because data lies in the [0,100] interval, and so I just divided by 100).

The estimates I got using GAMLSS showcase a very low $\nu$ estimate, i.e., the probability of a zero occuring. So, essentially, it just fitted a standard beta fit, a bit like this one on the top right corner:

enter image description here

Why does it do this? How can I fix it? What other distributions are there?

My data clearly DOES contain zeroes, many of them, so a standard beta is not a good fit.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do you have a small data set that shows the same problem? (possibly a subset of your data, if your own data set is large) $\endgroup$ – Glen_b Apr 27 '17 at 4:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.