The conjugate prior for a Poisson likelihood is the Gamma distribution, conveniently described with a shape parameter and a rate parameter (the inverse of a scale parameter).
Your choice of an exponential distribution would correspond to a prior shape parameter of $1$, at which point you would need to choose a prior rate parameter, inserting information into your prior.
An alternative approach might be to choose a prior shape parameter of $0$ and a prior rate parameter of $0$, which is improper and largely meaningless in itself but would have the result that after observing $x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n$ your posterior distribution would have a shape parameter of $\sum\limits_{i=1}^n x_i$ and a rate parameter of $n$. Providing that at least one of your observations was non-zero, this could be a fairly sensible posterior distribution with mean the intuitive $\frac{\sum x_i}{n}$, and easy to work with and update further; you can see how little prior information is involved.
In your example, your Gamma posterior distribution for $\lambda$ would then have shape parameter $6$ and rate parameter $9$ under this alternative approach; compare this with starting with an exponential prior where the posterior would have shape parameter $7$ and rate parameter $9$ plus whatever rate you had chosen initially for your exponential.