I would like to double-check with you guys whether i am interpreting my results correctly, before I move on with my analysis. I have read several other questions on this topic but non seemed to apply enough.

output robust regression

I am investigating whether having a reservation in a restaurant (significantly) results in more spending per person. I have included several (dummy) variables in my regression analysis, as well as some continuous. I have included interaction effects between having a reservation and the other variables too, as reservations are my main interest.

dummy variables of interest for this question: "Reservation " --> Walk-in = 0, Reservation = 1 "Dinner" --> Lunch = 0, Dinner = 1

As you can see from my results, the interaction effect between having a reservation and eating dinner is significant, but having a reservation on its own is not. Is it correct if I interpret this as:

"Having a reservation only has significant influence on spending if the reservation is made for dinner (and thus not for lunch)."


  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Relevant: What is effect coding? $\endgroup$ – Alexis Mar 15 '18 at 3:57
  • $\begingroup$ In your syntax the dependent variable is called Log. Is your outcome a log-transformed variable? $\endgroup$ – Jay Schyler Raadt Oct 5 '18 at 22:04

I would look at what this is doing to your predictions! Since Reservation and Dinner are both dummy variables, the coefficient for Reservation:Dinner will only subtract from your predicted value when both variables have a "1". So the interpretation here would be: "For groups that have a reservation (specifically) for dinner, we expect the amount spent per person to be $.0125 less on average than groups that did not have a reservation (inclusive) or were eating lunch"


Try generating a model where you only fit for Dinner and exclude Reservation, then run an anova - are the models significantly different? Without seeing your data I suspect the "effect" of Reservation + Dinner you're seeing is just the effect of Dinner. The interaction term has a lower p-value, higher standard error, and slope coefficient closer to zero than Dinner by itself, suggesting the interaction merely dampens the effect of Dinner.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.