The question is in the title: In both cases I use R² and Chi-Square to test if a fit/model is good enough. Up to now I only know that R² is used for models (?) and Chi-Square for Fits/functions (?). Is this true? And how exactly do they differ? Thank you!

  • $\begingroup$ The answer to this would almost amount to a complete introductory statistics course. Can you narrow it down a bit to a specific scientific analysis where you are in doubt what to do? $\endgroup$
    – mdewey
    Aug 1 '17 at 12:52
  • $\begingroup$ I'm just learning these two terms because I always stumble over them. And it confuses me. Also what's the difference between max likelihood and chi-square.. for me they are all doing the same and it's a bit hard to separate them (for me). $\endgroup$
    – Ben
    Aug 1 '17 at 12:56

Found this after a quick google: "R^2 is used to quantify the amount of variability in the data that is explained by your model. It's useful for comparing the fits of different models.

The Chi-square goodness of fit test is used to test if your data follows a particular distribution. It's more useful for testing model assumptions rather than comparing models."

sounds like Chi-square is more useful if you have a function you are trying to test (or a model you are trying to fit to your data) as opposed to the R^2 which tells you how much variability there is in your data, and therefore how much the best model fits.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! So that's my assumption :) But thanks anyway! Of interested is now how/why they are applied to different cases respectively in which way they work differently. $\endgroup$
    – Ben
    Aug 1 '17 at 13:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.