74
$\begingroup$

Suppose I'm running an experiment that can have 2 outcomes, and I'm assuming that the underlying "true" distribution of the 2 outcomes is a binomial distribution with parameters $n$ and $p$: ${\rm Binomial}(n, p)$.

I can compute the standard error, $SE_X = \frac{\sigma_X}{\sqrt{n}}$, from the form of the variance of ${\rm Binomial}(n, p)$: $$ \sigma^{2}_{X} = npq$$ where $q = 1-p$. So, $\sigma_X=\sqrt{npq}$. For the standard error I get: $SE_X=\sqrt{pq}$, but I've seen somewhere that $SE_X = \sqrt{\frac{pq}{n}}$. What did I do wrong?

$\endgroup$
2

4 Answers 4

102
$\begingroup$

It seems like you're using $n$ twice in two different ways - both as the sample size and as the number of bernoulli trials that comprise the Binomial random variable; to eliminate any ambiguity, I'm going to use $k$ to refer to the latter.

If you have $n$ independent samples from a ${\rm Binomial}(k,p)$ distribution, the variance of their sample mean is

$$ {\rm var} \left( \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_{i} \right) = \frac{1}{n^2} \sum_{i=1}^{n} {\rm var}( X_{i} ) = \frac{ n {\rm var}(X_{i}) }{ n^2 } = \frac{ {\rm var}(X_{i})}{n} = \frac{ k pq }{n} $$

where $q=1-p$ and $\overline{X}$ is the same mean. This follows since

(1) ${\rm var}(cX) = c^2 {\rm var}(X)$, for any random variable, $X$, and any constant $c$.

(2) the variance of a sum of independent random variables equals the sum of the variances.

The standard error of $\overline{X}$is the square root of the variance: $\sqrt{\frac{ k pq }{n}}$. Therefore,

  • When $k = n$, you get the formula you pointed out: $\sqrt{pq}$

  • When $k = 1$, and the Binomial variables are just bernoulli trials, you get the formula you've seen elsewhere: $\sqrt{\frac{pq }{n}}$

$\endgroup$
10
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ When $X$ is a bernoulli random variable, then ${\rm var}(X) = pq$. When $X$ has a binomial random variable based on $n$ trials with success probability $p$, then ${\rm var}(X) = npq$ $\endgroup$
    – Macro
    Jun 1, 2012 at 16:48
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Thanks! You lifted my confusion. Sorry that it was so elementary, I'm still learning :-) $\endgroup$
    – Frank
    Jun 1, 2012 at 17:02
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ So is it clear to Frank that we are using the fact that for any constant c Var(cX) =c$^2$Var(x)? Since the sample estimate of the proportion is X/n we have Var(X/n)=Var(X)/n$^2$ =npq/n$^2$ =pq/n and SEx is the square root of that. I think it is clearer for everyone if we spell out all the steps. $\endgroup$ Jun 1, 2012 at 21:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MichaelChernick, I've clarified the details you mentioned. Based on the problem description, I figured that Frank knew these facts but you're right that it would be more educational for future readers to include the details. $\endgroup$
    – Macro
    Jun 1, 2012 at 22:41
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Sol Lago - In this case k=1. If you flipped a coin 50 times and calculated the number of successes and then repeated the experiment 50 times, then k=n=50. A flip of a coin results in a 1 or 0. It is a Bernoulli r.v. $\endgroup$
    – B_Miner
    May 10, 2014 at 19:35
20
$\begingroup$

It's easy to get two binomial distributions confused:

  • distribution of number of successes
  • distribution of the proportion of successes

npq is the number of successes, while npq/n = pq is the ratio of successes. This results in different standard error formulas.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ This is by far the most succinct explanation. $\endgroup$
    – mrp
    Dec 18, 2020 at 19:28
11
$\begingroup$

We can look at this in the following way:

Suppose we are doing an experiment where we need to toss an unbiased coin $n$ times. The overall outcome of the experiment is $Y$ which is the summation of individual tosses (say, head as 1 and tail as 0). So, for this experiment, $Y = \sum_{i=1}^n X_i$, where $X_i$ are outcomes of individual tosses.

Here, the outcome of each toss, $X_i$, follows a Bernoulli distribution and the overall outcome $Y$ follows a binomial distribution.

The complete experiment can be thought as a single sample. Thus, if we repeat the experiment, we can get another value of $Y$, which will form another sample. All possible values of $Y$ will constitute the complete population.

Coming back to the single coin toss, which follows a Bernoulli distribution, the variance is given by $pq$, where $p$ is the probability of head (success) and $q = 1 – p$.

Now, if we look at Variance of $Y$, $V(Y) = V(\sum X_i) = \sum V(X_i)$. But, for all individual Bernoulli experiments, $V(X_i) = pq$. Since there are $n$ tosses or Bernoulli trials in the experiment, $V(Y) = \sum V(X_i) = npq$. This implies that $Y$ has variance $npq$.

Now, the sample proportion is given by $\hat p = \frac Y n$, which gives the 'proportion of success or heads'. Here, $n$ is a constant as we plan to take same no of coin tosses for all the experiments in the population.

So, $V(\frac Y n) = (\frac {1}{n^2})V(Y) = (\frac {1}{n^2})(npq) = pq/n$.

So, standard error for $\hat p$ (a sample statistic) is $\sqrt{pq/n}$

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ You can use Latex typesetting by putting dollars around your math, e.g. $x$ gives $x$. $\endgroup$
    – Silverfish
    Jun 28, 2016 at 20:52
  • $\begingroup$ Note that the step $V(\sum X_i)=\sum V(X_i)$ really deserves some justification! $\endgroup$
    – Silverfish
    Jun 28, 2016 at 20:53
  • $\begingroup$ There is typo in the last deduction, V(Y/n) = (1/n^2)*V(Y) = (1/n^2)*npq = pq/n should be the correct deduction. $\endgroup$ Jun 29, 2016 at 2:05
  • $\begingroup$ Apologies, I introduced that when doing the typesetting. Hopefully sorted now. $\endgroup$
    – Silverfish
    Jun 29, 2016 at 2:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That's true if the $X_i$ are uncorrelated - to justify this, we use the fact that the trials are assumed to be independent. $\endgroup$
    – Silverfish
    Jun 29, 2016 at 10:18
4
$\begingroup$

I think there is also some confusion in the initial post between standard error and standard deviation. Standard deviation is the sqrt of the variance of a distribution; standard error is the standard deviation of the estimated mean of a sample from that distribution, i.e., the spread of the means you would observe if you did that sample infinitely many times. The former is an intrinsic property of the distribution; the latter is a measure of the quality of your estimate of a property (the mean) of the distribution. When you do an experiment of N Bernouilli trials to estimate the unknown probability of success, the uncertainty of your estimated p=k/N after seeing k successes is a standard error of the estimated proportion, sqrt(pq/N) where q=1-p. The true distribution is characterized by a parameter P, the true probability of success. If you did an infinite number of experiments with N trials each and looked at the distribution of successes, it would have mean K=P*N, variance NPQ and standard deviation sqrt(NPQ).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.