0
$\begingroup$

This work is from a textbook where the answer is given as the MLE being $X_{1:n}$ where $1:n$ indicates the minimum value. The pdf of the distribution is given as: $$ f(x;\theta)=\begin{cases}2\theta^2x^{-3}\hspace{10pt}\theta\leq{x}\\0\hspace{33pt}x<\theta;0<\theta\end{cases} $$ Typically, I would calculate the log-likelihood which is $$ \ell(\theta)=n\ln(2)+2n\ln(\theta)-3\sum^n_{i=1}\ln(x_i), $$ and then take the derivative $$ \ell'(\theta)=\frac{2n}{\theta} $$ and then work out the maximum.

Obviously, in this case, it evaluates to zero and I'm not sure what I'm missing to understand how to get to the solution given. In this instance, how should I be calculating the MLE?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hint: this is a case in which you don't use derivatives to maximize the log-likelihood, but rather just inspect the log-likelihood and maximize directly. $\endgroup$ – Cliff AB Aug 7 '17 at 0:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Oh, right, so because the limits on theta are that it is between 0 and x, the log-likelihood is maximized at the highest value it can take which is the lowest observed value of x? $\endgroup$ – Syzorr Aug 7 '17 at 0:13
1
$\begingroup$

On inspection of the equation, it becomes obvious that the maximum of $\ell(\theta)$ is found for the largest possible value of $\theta$, therefore $$\hat{\theta}=X_{1:n}$$ as $0<\theta\leq{x}$

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.