12
$\begingroup$

In his answer to my previous question, @Erik P. gives the expression $$ \mathrm{Var}[s^2]=\sigma^4 \left(\frac{2}{n-1} + \frac{\kappa}{n}\right) \>, $$ where $\kappa$ is the excess kurtosis of the distribution. A reference to the Wikipedia entry on the distribution of the sample variance is given, but the wikipedia page says "citation needed".

My primary question is, is there a reference for this formula? Is it 'trivial' to derive, and if so, can it be found in a textbook? (@Erik P. couldn't find it in Mathematical statistics and data analysis nor I in Statistical Inference by Casella and Berger. Even though the topic is covered.

It would be nice to have a textbook reference, but even more useful to have a (the) primary reference.

(A related question is: What is the distribution of the variance of a sample from an unknown distribution?)

Update: @cardinal pointed out another equation on math.SE: $$ \mathrm{Var}(S^2)={\mu_4\over n}-{\sigma^4\,(n-3)\over n\,(n-1)} $$ where $\mu_4$ is the fourth central moment.

Is there some way that to rearranged the equations and resolve the two, or is the equation in the title wrong?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I don't think that formula is correct. $\endgroup$
    – cardinal
    Commented Jun 6, 2012 at 15:45
  • $\begingroup$ Related: math.stackexchange.com/a/73080/7003 $\endgroup$
    – cardinal
    Commented Jun 6, 2012 at 15:46
  • $\begingroup$ that related question was asked by @byron-schmuland $\endgroup$
    – Abe
    Commented Jun 6, 2012 at 16:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I think you mean answered, not asked. The formula given in this question is incorrect; as Byron's answer nicely demonstrates. :) $\endgroup$
    – cardinal
    Commented Jun 6, 2012 at 16:58
  • $\begingroup$ Unfortunately, such pinging doesn't work unless he's already participated in the comment stream. :( (It appears he has taken notice following the comment you posted on the question on the math site.) Cheers. $\endgroup$
    – cardinal
    Commented Jun 6, 2012 at 17:09

2 Answers 2

17
$\begingroup$

Source: Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, Mood, Graybill, Boes, 3rd Edition, 1974, p. 229.

Derivation: Note that in the OP's Wikipedia link, $\kappa$ is not the kurtosis but the excess kurtosis, which is the "regular" kurtosis - 3. To get back to the "regular" kurtosis we have to add 3 in the appropriate place in the Wikipedia formula.

We have, from MGB:

$\text{Var}[S^2] = {1\over{n}}(\mu_4 - {{n-3}\over{n-1}}\sigma^4)$

which, using the identity $\mu_4 = (\kappa + 3)\sigma^4$, can be arranged to (derivation mine, so any errors are too):

$ = {1\over{n}}(\kappa \sigma^4 + {{n-1}\over{n-1}}3\sigma^4 -{{n-3}\over{n-1}}\sigma^4) = \sigma^4\left({\kappa \over{n}}+{3(n-1)-(n-3)\over{n(n-1)}}\right) = \sigma^4\left({\kappa\over{n}} + {{2}\over{n-1}}\right) $

$\endgroup$
5
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ (+1) Nearly 40 years since the last edition, MGB is still the best beginning/intermediate introduction to math stat. It's a shame it has been out of print in the Western world for so long. $\endgroup$
    – cardinal
    Commented Jun 6, 2012 at 21:02
  • $\begingroup$ I found a pdf of MGD, but there is no citation to the original proof. Which is okay, but it would be nice to know where to find it. $\endgroup$
    – Abe
    Commented Jun 6, 2012 at 22:50
  • $\begingroup$ The actual derivation of the result is not in MGB, but rather us relegated to problem 5(b) on page 266. $\endgroup$
    – cardinal
    Commented Jun 6, 2012 at 22:54
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, not all statements come with proofs, but at least this one is in the text, not relegated to a question, and there's an outline of the approach to the proof on p. 230. $\endgroup$
    – jbowman
    Commented Jun 6, 2012 at 22:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Abe: You will almost certainly not find an "original" reference for this. It is not the sort of standalone "publishable" result found in academic journals. It is simply a (rather tedious) calculation following from the basic properties of mathematical expectation. Quoting a textbook like MGB is perfectly reasonable and acceptable. $\endgroup$
    – cardinal
    Commented Jun 6, 2012 at 22:57
9
$\begingroup$

It is not clear if this will suit your needs for a definitive reference, but this question comes up in the exercises of Casella and Berger:

(page 364, exercise 7.45 b):

enter image description here

With reference to exercise 5b that provides another variant, in which $\Theta_2$ and $\Theta_4$ are the second and fourth moments ($\sigma^2$ and $\kappa$), respectively:

enter image description here

These are equivalent to the equation given in an answer on math.SE:

$\mbox{Var}(S^2)={\mu_4\over n}-{\sigma^4\,(n-3)\over n\,(n-1)}$

$\endgroup$
12
  • $\begingroup$ It is interesting that your link and my link (in the comments to the OP) are different, but point to the same place. $\endgroup$
    – cardinal
    Commented Jun 6, 2012 at 16:30
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @cardinal - I just copy-pasted from the OP - but the last digits are the user id of the person who copies the link, e.g. my link would be math.stackexchange.com/a/73080/3733 $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 6, 2012 at 16:33
  • $\begingroup$ Aha! (+1) I did not notice that the last part of the link was one's own id! Thanks for pointing that out. We're being followed... $\endgroup$
    – cardinal
    Commented Jun 6, 2012 at 16:39
  • $\begingroup$ it is good to have a trustworthy reference, but would still be nice to track down the original. +1 for looking through the exercises. $\endgroup$
    – Abe
    Commented Jun 6, 2012 at 16:39
  • $\begingroup$ @cardinal one justification for / use of tracking is the badges for sharing links (announcer, booster, publicist) $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 6, 2012 at 16:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.