19
$\begingroup$

I see this kind of notation often

$$ p_{\theta} (x|z, y) = f(x; z, y, \theta) $$

I understand the conditional prob noation on the left. What is the significance of the ; on the joint prob on the right?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ My preference is to write $X|Y, Z; \theta, \phi$, to show conditional distributions, conditional on other random variables, and fixed, unknown parameters. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 4, 2017 at 19:54
  • $\begingroup$ You've got different guesses. Perhaps you could give one or two examples from published work and more context. $\endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    Commented Sep 5, 2017 at 6:36

1 Answer 1

23
$\begingroup$

What this notation says is that

$$ f(x; z, y, \theta) $$

is a function of $x$ with "parameters" $z, y, \theta$. It is just a way to visually show that they are of different kind (e.g. data vs parameters, random vs fixed quantities). While the conditional notation has precise meaning, this notation is used informally, to improve readability of the formulas rather than to convey any specific meaning.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ $z, y$ would be unusual notation for parameters. With no other information and if obliged to guess I would go for @tchakrcarty's interpretation. $\endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    Commented Sep 5, 2017 at 6:35
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry; that should be @tchakravarty. $\endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    Commented Sep 5, 2017 at 7:37
  • $\begingroup$ @NickCox I have seen the notation $p(b_i \mid T_i, \delta_i, y_t; \theta)$ used recently and had similar questions to what the notation meant. This quantity is the posterior distribution for $b_i$, and $T_i, \delta_i$ and $y_i$ are data, and $\theta$ is a parameter. For this reason, I agree with the answer that the ";" is used (or can be used) to separate data from parameters. $\endgroup$
    – JLee
    Commented Nov 20, 2019 at 15:23
  • $\begingroup$ @JLee I think what you say is fully consistent with my comment. Ending symbolism with $|$ data; parameters) is what tchakravarty was surmising and I was supporting. $\endgroup$
    – Nick Cox
    Commented Nov 20, 2019 at 16:03
  • $\begingroup$ @NickCox Sorry, yes. I have just reread. I agree with tchakravarty's interpretation. $\endgroup$
    – JLee
    Commented Nov 20, 2019 at 20:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.