I am trying to understand the abstract below from Pearlmutter's paper.
Can someone clarify to me why $R_{\bf{v}}\{\bf{w}\}=\bf{v}$? Thanks a lot!
Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityI am trying to understand the abstract below from Pearlmutter's paper.
Can someone clarify to me why $R_{\bf{v}}\{\bf{w}\}=\bf{v}$? Thanks a lot!
It's kind of obvious, here:
$$\mathcal{R}_\mathrm{\textbf{v}}(\mathrm{\textbf{w}})\equiv (\partial/\partial r) (\mathrm{\textbf{w}}+r\mathrm{\textbf{v}})=\mathrm{\textbf{v}}$$