1
$\begingroup$

So, I have this question:

enter image description here

And, what I have tried so far is I let $z_1 = \frac{X + Y}{2}$ and let $z_2 = \frac{X - Y}{2}$ to use change of variables for this question. However, when I work this out and plug it into my joint distribution of $X$ and $Y$ above, I end up with the $z_2$ disappearing and only having $z_1$ left in my joint distribution of $z_1$ and $z_2$. So, then when I go to find the marginal for just $z_1$ (which is $\frac{X + Y}{2}$ <- what I am looking for), there is no $z_2$ therefore, integrating wrt to $z_2$, I get $z_2$ just come up (integral of 1). This is an issue because the bounds are from 0 to $\inf$. Obviously, I can't have infinite in my marginal density so what am I doing wrong?

Also, for question 5, I work it out similarly except I let $z_2 = X$ but I just end up with the exact same density as $f_{x,y}$ as seen in question 4 - is that normal? Please help, I been doing this question for a long time trying various dummy transformations.

Also, for question 4, I found the marginals of $x$ and $y$ and realized that the independence consequence (of the product being equal to the joint) is satisfied but using convolution, I get the same issue of my integral coming out to infinite! Thank you for all the help!

EDIT: Am I doing my bounds wrong? the bound for z_2 is from 0 to inf or 0 to z_1?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Convolution, properly understood, is the correct method. But of course you don't use just the marginals--you integrate over the joint distribution. See stats.stackexchange.com/search?q=sum+dependent for many examples. In this simple case a basic approach, derived from the definitions, will work fine: find the chance that $X\le x$ and, simultaneously, $X+Y\le z$. That gives the joint distribution function. $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Sep 22, 2017 at 21:00
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, I don't have the best foundation for this kind of stuff, but it looks like in your comment your telling me to find the common ground between X and X+Y but I don't know the best way of going about doing that. Like, I have found the marginals of X and Y thus far and I don't know how I would identify the X+Y in the approach you are mentioning $\endgroup$
    – ren
    Sep 22, 2017 at 21:15
  • $\begingroup$ @whuber Did you mean: P(X <= x) = P(X <= Z - Y) \\ 2 - 2e^(-x) = 2 - 2e^(z-y) or something? $\endgroup$
    – ren
    Sep 22, 2017 at 21:21

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

First, you can see that $X$ and $Y$ are independent. This is because the joint pdf is: $f_{XY}(x,y)=e^{-(x+y)}=e^{-x} e^{-y}$ (read this for independent random variables if you are not sure).

Also, you can get pdf of $X, Y$ by integration of the joint pdf.

$$f(x)=\int_0^{\infty}e^{-(x+y)}dy=e^{-x}\\f(y)=\int_0^{\infty}e^{-(x+y)}dx=e^{-y}$$

After you know the independence of $X,Y$, to find the distribution $(X+Y)/2$ will be not difficult.

I would like to use moment generating functions for this kind of problems.

Let $Z=\frac{X+Y}{2}$

$$E(e^{tZ})=E[e^{\left( t\frac{X+Y}{2} \right)}]=E(e^{t\frac{X}{2}} e^{t\frac{Y}{2}})$$

$\text{(by independence of X, Y )}$

$$=E(e^{t\frac{X}{2}})E(e^{t\frac{Y}{2}})=\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{t\frac{x}{2}}e^{-x}dx \times \int_{0}^{\infty}e^{t\frac{y}{2}}e^{-y}dy=\frac{1}{(1-\frac{t}{2})^2} , \text{t<2 here}$$

i.e. $$E(e^{tZ})=\frac{1}{(1-\frac{t}{2})^2}$$

$\therefore$ $Z$ has a gamma distribution with $\beta=1/2$ and $\alpha=2$

i.e $f(z)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(1/2)(1/2)^2}ze^{-2z}, 0<z<\infty$

For questions 5. You can use joint distribution of $f_{XY}(x,y)$ and Jacobian, such as let $Z =X+Y$ then $Y=X-Z$. It should not be very difficult

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much for the great answer! I just had a follow up question: for question 5, you said I could just use the jacobian but then why could I not just do that for question 4? However, if I do it that way, I end up with a different distribution... So, why can I use it in question 5, but not for question 4 where I would just have the added step of finding the marginal for Z? Thank you. $\endgroup$
    – ren
    Sep 27, 2017 at 22:43
  • $\begingroup$ You can use Jacobian in question 4 , then you better solve question 5 first, then you can solve questin 4 from 5. For question 5 you do this way, Let $Z_1=X, Z_2=X+Y$ and your Jacobian is a $2 \times 2$ determinant. $\endgroup$
    – Deep North
    Sep 27, 2017 at 23:15
  • $\begingroup$ But when I use the jacobian, I don't get the gamma distribution, I get e^-z2 * z_2 for 4 $\endgroup$
    – ren
    Sep 27, 2017 at 23:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.