I was looking at this notebook, and I am puzzled by this statement:

When we talk about normality what we mean is that the data should look like a normal distribution. This is important because several statistic tests rely on this (e.g. t-statistics).

I don't understand why a T-statistic needs the data to follow a normal distribution.

Indeed, Wikipedia says the same thing:

Student's t-distribution (or simply the t-distribution) is any member of a family of continuous probability distributions that arises when estimating the mean of a normally distributed population

However, I don't understand why this assumption is necessary.

Nothing from its formula indicates to me that the data has to follow a normal distribution:

enter image description here

I looked a bit on its definition but I don't understand why the condition is necessary.


The information you require is in the "Characterization" section of the Wiki page. A $t$-distribution with degrees of freedom $\nu$ may be defined as the distribution of the random variable $T$ such that $$T = \dfrac{Z}{\sqrt{V/\nu}} \,,$$ where $Z$ is a standard normal distribution random variable and $V$ is a $\chi^2$ random variable with degrees of freedom $\nu$. In addition, $Z$ and $V$ must be independent. So given any $Z$ and $V$ that follow the above definition, you can then arrive at a random variable that has a $t$-distribution.

Now, suppose $X_1, X_2, \dots, X_n$ is distributed according to a distribution $F$. Let $F$ have mean $\mu$ and variance $\sigma^2$. Let $\bar{X}$ be the sample mean and $S^2$ be the sample variance. We will then look at the formulae:

$$\dfrac{\bar{X} - \mu}{S/\sqrt{n}} = \dfrac{\frac{\bar{X} - \mu}{\sigma/\sqrt{n}}}{\sqrt{\frac{(n-1)S^2}{(n-1)\sigma^2}}} \,.$$

If, $F$ denotes the normal distribution, then $\bar{X} \sim N(\mu, \sigma^2/n)$, and thus $\frac{\bar{X} - \mu}{\sigma/\sqrt{n}} \sim N(0,1)$. In addition, $\frac{(n-1)S^2}{\sigma^2} \sim \chi^2_{n-1}$ by Cochran's Theorem. Finally, by an application of Basu's theorem, $\bar{X}$ and $S^2$ are independent. This then implies that the resulting statistic has a $t$-distribution with $n-1$ degrees of freedom.

If the original data distribution $F$ was not normal, then, the exact distribution of the numerator and denominator will not be standard normal and $\chi^2$, respectively, and thus the resulting statistics will not have a $t$-distribution.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I've always found it quite interesting how much mathematical technology go into these foundational results in mathematical statistics. $\endgroup$ – Matthew Drury Dec 20 '17 at 16:04
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Good post. However, we don't need to invoke those big theorems to prove the independence between $\bar{X}$ and $S$, as well as the $\chi^2$ distribution. See the first answer of this post. $\endgroup$ – Zhanxiong Dec 20 '17 at 21:40

I think there may be some confusion between the statistic and its formula, versus the distribution and its formula. You can apply the t-statistic formula to any dataset and get a "t-statistic", but this statistic will not be distributed according to the student-t distribution unless the data came from a normal distribution (or at least, will not be guaranteed to be; my guess is that non-normal distributions won't produce a student-t distribution when the t-statistic formula is applied, but I'm not certain of that). The reason for this is simply that the distribution of the t-statistic is calculated from the distribution of the data that generated it, so if you have a different underlying distribution, then you're not guaranteed to have the same distribution for derived statistics.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.