1
$\begingroup$

Let $(X_1,X_2,\ldots,X_n)$ be a random sample from $N(\mu,\sigma^2)$, where $\sigma$ is known. Find the power function of the test of significance of $H_0:\mu=\mu_0$ against $H_1:\mu\neq\mu_0$ . Also, show that power${}>{}$size. My first step is to define the critical region as $W=\{(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n):|\sqrt{n}(\bar x-\mu_0)/\sigma|>\tau _{\alpha/2}\}$ where $P[Z>\tau_\alpha]=\alpha$, $Z\sim N(0,1)$, and $\alpha$ is the level of significance.

The power function of the test of significance is then,

$\beta(\mu)=P[(X_1,\ldots,X_n)\in W|\mu\in\Omega_1]=P[|\sqrt{n}(\bar x-\mu_0)/\sigma|>\tau _{\alpha/2}|\mu\neq\mu_0]$

and the size of the test of significance is,

$\sup\limits_{\mu \in\Omega_0}P[ (X_1,\ldots,X_n)\in W|\mu\in\Omega_0]=P[|\sqrt{n}(\bar x-\mu_0)/\sigma|>\tau _{\alpha/2}|\mu=\mu_0]$.

How do I proceed from here?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Your notation $P[(X_1,\ldots,X_n)\in W|\mu\in\Omega_1]$ has no sense. It is true that one commonly says that the power is the probability to reject under $H_1$ (here $H_1=\{\mu \in \Omega_1\}$ but unfortunately this has no sense because there are several possible probabilities under $H_1$.

The power function is $\mu \mapsto P[(X_1,\ldots,X_n)\in W|\mu]$ when we consider that $(X_1, \ldots, X_n)$ is a i.i.d.\ sample of ${\cal N}(\mu, \sigma^2)$ under the probability $P[\cdot|\mu]$. Rigorously we may consider that the power is not defined for $\mu=\mu_0$ but this has no importance.

Finally to answer your question you have to show that the distribution of the test statistic $\left|\sqrt{n}\frac{\bar X - \mu_0}{\sigma}\right|$ under $P(\cdot |\mu)$ is stochastically increasing in $\mu$. This tantamounts to say that the distribution of $\left|\bar X - \mu_0\right|$ under $P(\cdot |\mu)$ is stochastically increasing in $\mu$ when $\mu > \mu_0$ and stochastically decreasing in $\mu$ when $\mu < \mu_0$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ statement of your first paragraph is absolutely right. can you please edit \left|\frac{\barX-\mu_0}\right so that i can understand your word.Lastly how can I show the test statistic is stochastically increasing in $\mu$ $\endgroup$ – Argha Jul 19 '12 at 12:57
  • $\begingroup$ The LaTeX does not work with my navigator. Is it ok now ? I will come back later for the stochastic monotonicity. $\endgroup$ – Stéphane Laurent Jul 19 '12 at 13:16
2
$\begingroup$

Note that $\beta(\mu)=P[(X_1,\ldots,X_n)\in W|\mu\in\Omega_1]=P[|\sqrt{n}(\bar X-\mu_0)/\sigma|>\tau _{\alpha/2}]$$=P[\sqrt{n}(\bar X-\mu_0)/\sigma>\tau _{\alpha/2}$ or $<-\tau_{\alpha/2}$]$=P[\sqrt{n}(\bar X-\mu)/\sigma+\sqrt{n}(\mu-\mu_0)/\sigma>\tau _{\alpha/2}$ or $ < -\tau _{\alpha/2}]$$$=P[\sqrt{n}(\bar X-\mu)/\sigma>\tau _{\alpha/2}+\sqrt{n}(\mu_0-\mu)/\sigma]+P[\sqrt{n}(\bar X-\mu)/\sigma>-\tau _{\alpha/2}+\sqrt{n}(\mu_0-\mu)/\sigma]$$$$=1-\Phi(\tau _{\alpha/2}+\sqrt{n}(\mu_0-\mu)/\sigma)+\Phi(-\tau _{\alpha/2}+\sqrt{n}(\mu_0-\mu)/\sigma)$$Now differentiate $\beta(\mu)$ w.r.t $\mu$ we get $$\beta'(\mu)=[\phi(\tau _{\alpha/2}+\sqrt{n}(\mu_0-\mu)/\sigma)-\phi(-\tau _{\alpha/2}+\sqrt{n}(\mu_0-\mu)/\sigma)]\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\sigma}$$ Now equating $\beta'(\mu)=0$ we get $$\phi(\tau _{\alpha/2}+\sqrt{n}(\mu_0-\mu)/\sigma)=\phi(\tau _{\alpha/2}+\sqrt{n}(\mu-\mu_0)/\sigma)$$ [Since $\phi (-x)=\phi(x)$]$$=>\mu=\mu_0$$ Note that if $\mu<\mu_0$ then $\beta'(\mu)<0 $ and if $\mu>\mu_0$ then $\beta'(\mu)>0 $ So from the first order derivative test we get $\beta(\mu)$ is minimum at $\mu=\mu_0$. So,hence it is proved that power > size

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.