0
$\begingroup$

I created the scatterplot on the left in Tableau and ran the regression line, which resulted in an R^2 of 0.63 (confirmed this in excel as well). Then, I used the "Force y-intercept to zero" option in line settings and was surprised to find that the R^2 value of my regression line actually increased (see scatter on right with intercept of 0 and R^2 of 0.67). This is counter-intuitive to me because I thought that the purpose of a regression line was to create the line that results in the highest R^2 value. How could forcing it go to go through (0,0) increase the R^2? Thanks in advance for your help.

Link to Raw Data is here (not sure how to force through origin with google sheets): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NM40zQzpk7GCfh1qws76Bmgc1DDdpztJpKjlcxnhUDs/edit?usp=sharing

enter image description here

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by whuber regression Mar 7 '18 at 1:05

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • $\begingroup$ Would you please post a link to the data? $\endgroup$ – James Phillips Mar 7 '18 at 0:56
  • $\begingroup$ Actually the regression line is fit by least squares which minimizes the sum of squared residuals. This is not quite the same as maximizing R$^2$. Also the calculated R$^2$ has strange properties when the line is fit with constraints. Also if I read your graphs correctly the least squares line has an intercept near the origin.. $\endgroup$ – Michael Chernick Mar 7 '18 at 0:57
  • $\begingroup$ See stats.stackexchange.com/search?q=R+origin+regression for additional posts on this topic. $\endgroup$ – whuber Mar 7 '18 at 1:06
  • $\begingroup$ I see that this question was marked as duplicate, but the answer to the other question is extremely long and involves a multitude of statistical formulas and R. Can anyone please give me a 2 or 3 sentence answer to this? $\endgroup$ – WP Data Mar 7 '18 at 1:25