0
$\begingroup$

This question already has an answer here:

I have a question like this, $X \sim N(\mu,\sigma^2)$ with unknown parameters. Now, a sample of size $m$ generated from X, but filter by X < T, i.e., any number larger than T will be ignored and continue until we have $m$ samples.

How to estimate $\mu$ and $\sigma$?

I suppose we could use E-M algorithm? Since this is similar to the case of missing data.

This is what I've come up so far:

$L(\mu,\sigma^2;x_1,..,x_m,x_{m+1},..x_n) = \prod_i^m f(x_i) \prod_{m+1}^n (1-\Phi(T))$
$Log L(\mu,\sigma^2;x_1,..x_m,x_{m+1},..x_n) = \sum_i^m log(f(x_i)) + \sum_{m+1}^n log(1-\Phi(T))$

Then how to take derivative of the Log likelihood with respect to $\mu$ and $\sigma^2$, also $n$ is unknown, need to be estimated here?

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by whuber Mar 16 '18 at 15:35

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • $\begingroup$ Can you write out the likelihood function for the observed data? That's a start... $\endgroup$ – jbowman Mar 16 '18 at 4:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You can use a maximum likelihood approach, using the probability density function given here $\endgroup$ – matteo Mar 16 '18 at 8:08
  • $\begingroup$ @MatteoLisi Then use numerical method to find MLE? $\endgroup$ – Demo Mar 16 '18 at 14:57
  • $\begingroup$ @jbowman I tried, but still stuck here.. $\endgroup$ – Demo Mar 16 '18 at 15:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Use the method from: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/133347/… $\endgroup$ – kjetil b halvorsen Mar 16 '18 at 15:17