3
$\begingroup$

In time series analysis, an AR$(1)$ model takes the form:

$$x_t = \beta_0 + \beta_1 \cdot x_{t-1} + w_t,$$

where $w_t$ is the white noise term.

In order for the model to be stationary and to converge to the mean, $\beta_1$ must be less than one. However, I don't get why such a model converges to B0 as opposed to $\beta_0 + \beta_1 \cdot \beta_0$. Surely, $\beta_1 \cdot \beta_0$ is large enough to matter even if $\beta_1 < 1$. I can see how the rest of the terms eventually approach zero as you recursively keep on subbing in $x_t$ into $x_{t-1}$ in order to calculate $x_{t+1}$, but even if you keep on doing this to calculate $x_{t+\infty}$ there is always a $\beta_0 \cdot \beta_1$ term.

Is my math wrong?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ it converges to B0/(1-B1). Which is basically B0 + B0*B1 + B0*B1^2 + B0*B1^3 + .... $\endgroup$ – Julius Apr 8 '18 at 21:54
3
$\begingroup$

Taking expectations of both sides and letting $\mu \equiv \mathbb{E}(X_t)$ be the stationary mean, you have:

$$\mu = \beta_0 + \beta_1 \mu.$$

Rearranging then gives:

$$\mu = \frac{\beta_0}{1-\beta_1}.$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.