In the textbook, Introductory Econometrics (Wooldridge), the concept of specifying log/log, level/log ... , is explained as a tool to understand the relationships of the regerssors either in relative or absolute terms. Using log transformation is also explained as having desirable properties like capturing non-linear relationships in a linear regression, reducing the influence of outliers and so forth.

Question: My question mostly refers to the point on log capturing non-linear relationships. If log transforming captures non-linear relationships, why are there examples in the textbook and in the real world where we have both log and squared or cubed terms? something like:

log(y) = c + log(x1) + log(x1^2) + log(xk) + u

Wooldridge also points out ambiguity in what log squared terms mean. It could be as above, or the one below (where we log first, then square the whole term):

 log(y) = c + log(x1) + log(x1)^2 + log(xk) + u

In either event, is it fair to say that log transforming alone does not adequately capture non-linear components, and thus we include squared/cubed terms? Or, perhaps using log is mainly for theory (relative/absolute inference) and including squared/cubed terms still is needed?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $\log(x_1^2) = 2\log(x_1)$ so as written this does not make a lot of sense - are you sure this formulation is what appears in the textbook (and in "the real world")? $\endgroup$ – Juho Kokkala May 12 '18 at 10:54
  • $\begingroup$ @JuhoKokkala Is almost the same, I am inept at latex encoding, I'll try to fix though. $\endgroup$ – Arash Howaida May 12 '18 at 10:55

Logs certainly don't capture all nonlinear relationships. Sometimes a polynomial term is better, sometimes you really need something more flexible such as a spline.

And sometimes we want logs of variables because it makes substantive sense. We might, conceivably, even want a spline of a log term.

  • $\begingroup$ Time permitting, I would love to see an example specification using logs and splines together. $\endgroup$ – Arash Howaida May 12 '18 at 14:25
  • $\begingroup$ I don't have an example but, suppose income was one of the IVs and it was related in nonmonotonic ways to the DV. Then that would be a good candidate. $\endgroup$ – Peter Flom - Reinstate Monica May 12 '18 at 15:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.