3
$\begingroup$

So here's the situation: There are n balls. Each ball has been voted on a scale of 1-N by an arbitrary number of people.

Every day (or every week, or more), some/most/all of the previous voters and some new voters are able to vote on the balls again. The thing is, I don't want all previous votes to all disappear because the votes that were valid yesterday are still valid today. The re-votes/new votes will just be weighted "more".

There can be more OR fewer people who vote during the new voting session.

What is a good method of data decay for this? I have thought of taking the square root of "yesterday"'s votes every day/week, but that doesn't seem like it would work well if I have lots of voters in one day because the square root of the sum of the votes doesn't decay that "much" and if I have few voters, the square root of the sum of the votes can decay less and so the new, initial votes, will skew the result set. I could be wrong; I'm not sure.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps some sort of weighted moving average? $\endgroup$
    – Peter Flom
    Aug 18, 2012 at 17:17
  • $\begingroup$ Well, from Wikipedia: "A moving average is commonly used with time series data to smooth out short-term fluctuations and highlight longer-term trends or cycles." That seems to be what I want, yes. $\endgroup$
    – Apothem
    Aug 18, 2012 at 17:58
  • $\begingroup$ But that doesn't answer the question because what you need to specify is how many terms to included in the moving average. $\endgroup$
    – Michael R. Chernick
    Aug 18, 2012 at 18:16
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure what you mean by terms. Do you mean how many balls will be taken into consideration for the decay? If so, all N balls would be taken into consideration. $\endgroup$
    – Apothem
    Aug 18, 2012 at 18:50

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2
$\begingroup$

The EWMA (Exponentially Weighted Moving Average) is an alternative. Newer observations receive higher weigths than olders ones depending on the decay factor $\lambda \epsilon [0,1]$

$ \bar{X}_t = (1-\lambda) X_{t-1} + \lambda \bar{X}_{t-1}$

To start the recursion, an starting value $X_0$ is required, depending on each case, this can be a mean over an "initializing" period. From this formula it's not clear why this is an exponential weight but this can be shown mathematically by replacing $\bar{X}_{t-1}$ (and so on) by the very same formula until expressing $\bar{X}_{t}$ as function of {$X_0,X_1, ...,X_{t-1}$}.

You will find applications for volatility estimation of financial returns.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.