1
$\begingroup$

Assume that $Y\sim \mathcal{N}(\mu,I_n)$. Let $C$ be some polyhedral cone in $\mathbb{R}^n$, that is $C = \{x\in\mathbb{R}^n, Ax\geq 0\}$ for some matrix $A$ which we could take to be a full rank square matrix.

I assume that $\mu\notin C$. I'm studying the following conditional probability $$ \mathbb{P}(\|Y\|^2>q\left|Y\in C\right.) $$ I want to prove that $$ \mathbb{P}(\|Y\|^2>q\left|Y\in C\right.)\leq \mathbb{P}(\|Y-\mu\|^2>q\left|Y-\mu\in C\right.) $$ (which is practically $\mathbb{P}(\|Y-\mu\|^2>q)$ since the direction and the norm of a Gaussian $\mathcal{N}(0,I_n)$ are independent).

I was able to prove this when the polyhedral cone $C$ is a quadrant (or orthant in higher dimensions) by proving that the conditional probability is increasing in each coordinate of $\mu$ (assuming that $\mu<0$).

For example, let $\mu\in(-\infty,0)$. Let $C=\{x, x>0\}$. I can prove that $$\mathbb{P}(Y^2>q|Y>0)$$ is increasing in $\mu$. See the figure attached.

The case of $n=1$. When $\mu\notin C$, the conditional probability increases till $\mu=0$, but continues after that till 1.

The case of a general polyhedral cone $C$ seems to follow the same way, but I still could not prove it.

Any help ?

Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ Please clarify what you mean by a "cone": are you discussing one lobe or two? If it's just one, as suggested by your quadrant example, then there are obvious counterexamples for $n=1$. $\endgroup$ – whuber May 24 '18 at 15:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Sorry, I meant the polyhedral cone $C$ is a quadrant (or orthant in higher dimensions). When $n=1$ and $\mu<0$ and let the polyhedral cone be $\{x, x>0\}$, then my claim writes $\mathbb{P}(Y^2>q|Y>0)$ is increasing in $\mu$. $\endgroup$ – Diaa Al mohamad May 24 '18 at 21:48
  • $\begingroup$ Note that when $n=1$ (or 2), a cone is a polyhedral cone and vice versa. Moreover, the type of polyhedral cones I consider have their the origin as the point of intersection of all the polyhedron faces. When $n=1$, the only cones are $(-\infty,0]$ and $[0,\infty)$. $\endgroup$ – Diaa Al mohamad May 25 '18 at 10:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm just a lazy bum, so I haven't even checked this for a simple counterexample. If the following stronger statement is true (I'm not saying it is), your conjecture immediately follows as a consequence. If the minimum to the optimization problem: minimize w.r.t. $x$, $ \mathbb{P}(\|Y - x\| <= q \| A(Y-x) \ge 0)$ is achieved at $x = \mu$, you're done. $\endgroup$ – Mark L. Stone May 25 '18 at 11:49
  • $\begingroup$ Yes Mark, it is indeed a valid approach (actually it is the title of my question :) ). The problem resides in working with the derivatives. $\endgroup$ – Diaa Al mohamad May 25 '18 at 20:47
1
$\begingroup$

The answer was provided to me by Eric Cator. Here is his formulation which is almost the same.

Let $Z$ be a Gaussian random vector $\mathcal{N}(0,I_n)$ for some positive integer $n$. Let $q>0$, $F\subset\mathbb{R}^n$ be a cone, and let $F^o$ be its polar cone. Then, $$\mathbb{P}\left(\|Z+\mu\|>q|Z+\mu\in F\right)\leq \mathbb{P}\left(\|Z\|>q|Z\in F\right), \quad \forall \mu\in F^o.$$ Proof:

We rewrite the conditional probability in polar coordinates. Let $S=\{\omega\in\mathbb{R}^n| \; \|\omega\|=1\}$ be the unit sphere in $\mathbb{R}^n$. Denote $\nu$ the surface measure on $S$. We have $$\mathbb{P}\left(\|Z+\mu\|>q|Z+\mu\in F\right) = \frac{\int_{r=q}^{\infty}\int_{\omega\in S \cap F}t^{n-1}e^{-\frac{1}{2}\|tw-\mu\|^2}\nu(d\omega)dt}{\int_{r=0}^{\infty}\int_{\omega\in S \cap F}s^{n-1}e^{-\frac{1}{2}\|sw-\mu\|^2}\nu(d\omega)ds} $$ This means that the conditional density of $\|Z+\mu\|$ provided that $\{Z+\mu\in F\}$ is given by $$g_{\mu}(t) = \frac{t^{n-1}e^{-\frac{1}{2}t^2}\int_{\omega\in S \cap F}e^{tw^T\mu}\nu(d\omega)}{\int_{r=0}^{\infty}\int_{\omega\in S \cap F}s^{n-1}e^{-\frac{1}{2}s^2+sw^T\mu}\nu(d\omega)ds}.$$ Denote $A(\mu)$ the normalization constant in the previous display, that is $$A(\mu) = \int_{r=0}^{\infty}\int_{\omega\in S \cap F}s^{n-1}e^{-\frac{1}{2}s^2+sw^T\mu}\nu(d\omega)ds.$$ Define $$G_{\mu}(t) = \frac{g_0(t)}{g_{\mu}(t)} = \frac{A(\mu)}{A(0)}\frac{\int_{\omega\in S \cap F}\nu(d\omega)}{\int_{\omega\in S \cap F}e^{t\omega^T\mu}\nu(d\omega)}.$$ Since $\mu\in F^o$, then $$\forall\omega\in S \cap F, \quad \omega^T\mu \leq 0.$$ Thus, function $t\mapsto G_{\mu}(t)$ is nondecreasing over $(0,\infty)$ whatever the value of $\mu\in F^o$.

Let $h$ be some measurable nondecreasing function defined on $\mathbb{R}_+$. Note that for any couple of nonnegative real numbers $(r_1,r_2)$, since both $G_{\mu}(t)$ and $h(t)$ are nondecreasing functions in $t$ over $(0,\infty)$, we have \begin{equation} (h(r_1)-h(r_2))(G_{\mu}(r_1)-G_{\mu}(r_2))\geq 0 \qquad (1) \end{equation} Let $R_1$ and $R_2$ be two i.i.d. random variables with a common density defined on $(0,\infty)$. We have, due to (1), $$\mathbb{E}\left[\left(h(R_1)-h(R_2)\right)\left(G(R_1)-G(R_2)\right)\right]\geq 0.$$ We deduce that \begin{equation} \mathbb{E}\left[h(R_1)G_{\mu}(R_1)\right]\geq \mathbb{E}\left[h(R_1)\right]\mathbb{E}\left[G_{\mu}(R_1)\right]. \qquad (2) \end{equation} Assume now that $R_1$ has the density $g_{\mu}$, and denote $\mathbb{E}_{\mu}$ (resp. $\mathbb{E}_0$) the expectation under $g_{\mu}$ (resp. $g_0$). We have now \begin{align*} \mathbb{E}_{\mu}\left[h(R_1)G_{\mu}(R_1)\right] & = \mathbb{E}_{0}\left[h(R_1)\right] \\ \mathbb{E}_{\mu}\left[G_{\mu}(R)\right] & = 1. \end{align*} The second line in the previous display comes from the fact that $g_0$ is a density over $(0,\infty)$. Hence, due to (2), we may write \begin{equation} \mathbb{E}_{\mu}\left[h(R)\right] \leq \mathbb{E}_{0}\left[h(R)\right]. \qquad (3) \end{equation} Set $h(t) = 1_{t>q}$ (the indicator function of the set $(q,\infty)$). Function $h$ is nondecreasing over $(0,\infty)$, therefore we could apply (3) on it and get $$\frac{\int_{r=q}^{\infty}\int_{\omega\in S \cap F}t^{n-1}e^{-\frac{1}{2}\|tw^T\mu\|^2}\nu(d\omega)dt}{\int_{r=0}^{\infty}\int_{\omega\in S \cap F}s^{n-1}e^{-\frac{1}{2}\|sw^T\mu\|^2}\nu(d\omega)ds} \leq \frac{\int_{r=q}^{\infty}\int_{\omega\in S \cap F}t^{n-1}\nu(d\omega)dt}{\int_{r=0}^{\infty}\int_{\omega\in S \cap F}s^{n-1}\nu(d\omega)ds}. $$ This is exactly what we claim.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.