There are two schools of thought when it comes to definitin of equivariance, covariance, invariance, and same-equivariance.
Covariance is a concept often used in physics and is the same term as equivariance. Both are used when applying the transformation $\pi$ on the input of the function $f$ can be achieved by appying another transformation $\psi$ on the output of the function:
$f(\pi(x))=\psi(f(x))$
Same-equivariance is an especial case of equivariance when $\psi=\pi$ (in some literature, same-equivariance is termed as equivariance, and instead, equivariance is termed covariance):
$f(\pi(x))=\pi(f(x))$
Invariance is another especial case when the transformation $\psi$ is the identity function ($\psi=\mathbb{1}$)
$f(\pi(x))=f(x)$
Based on the above definitions:
- convolution is "equivariant" to translation
- convolution is also "same-equivariant" to translation,
- and since covariance is just another term for the same concept, convolution is "covariant" to translation.
Same is true for convolutional layers.