Is there any conceptual difference in the prediction interval for simple linear regression between classical and bayesian statistics with non-informative prior?


Yes. In fact there is no such thing as really non-informative prior, and very often those "non-informative" priors lead to results different from the frequentist approach of likelihood maximization.

However, depending of your parameters you can find a prior matching the frequentist approach. Very often you can in fact find priors at least weakly informative (e.g a salary is positive).This will allow you to derive better confidence interval than with the frequentist approach, especially for small datasets.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. Is there any advantage for Bayesian approach on future unobserved data? @mobupu $\endgroup$ – Reza Jun 2 '18 at 2:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.