5
$\begingroup$

Please correct me if I am wrong.

The general form of k-parameter exponential family is

$f(x;\boldsymbol{\theta}) = a(\boldsymbol{\theta})g(x) \exp\{\sum_{i=1}^{k}b_(\boldsymbol{\theta}) R_i(x)\}$

Let, $X_1, \ldots, X_n \sim \dfrac{1}{\sigma} \exp\{ -(x-\mu)/\sigma \} I(x>\mu); \mu \in R, \sigma \in R^+$ [the common pdf of negative exponential distribution].

The joint distribution is

$\dfrac{1}{\sigma^n} \exp\{ -\sum_{i=1}^{n}(x_i-\mu)/\sigma \} I(x_{n:1}>\mu)$

which cannot be absorbed in the general expression of the exponential family mentioned above due to the part $I(x_{n:1}>\mu)$.

Thus the negative exponential distribution does not belong to the exponential family.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The usual one-parameter exponential (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_distribution) is in the family, but if you add a location-shift parameter, then it isn't. $\endgroup$ – Glen_b Jul 10 '18 at 12:22
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your reply. If the location parameter, $\mu$ is known, then this belongs to one-parameter exponential family. I hope I am correct? $\endgroup$ – Sheikh Jul 10 '18 at 15:45
  • $\begingroup$ You can write it as $\exp(\eta(\theta)T(x)-A(\theta))$ (setting $h$ to $1$), because if $\mu$ is known, you can put it in $T(x)$. [If this is homework you should clearly signal that.] $\endgroup$ – Glen_b Jul 11 '18 at 1:10
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you again. This is not a homework problem. I wanted to clarify my understanding of exponential family. Your comments really helped. $\endgroup$ – Sheikh Jul 11 '18 at 4:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If the support depends on a parameter (as it does for $\mu$) then it can't be exponential family, but if you know $\mu$ then that's just a constant, not a parameter. $\endgroup$ – Glen_b Jul 11 '18 at 5:15
5
$\begingroup$

This is correct, if $\mu$ is a parameter of the distribution rather than a given, the indicator function implies this distribution is not an exponential family.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your reply. Thanks for writing the logic of not belonging to the exponential family. $\endgroup$ – Sheikh Jul 10 '18 at 15:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.