My understanding is the the random forest picks randomly mtry variables to build each decision tree. So if mtry=ncol/3 then each variables will be used on average in 1/3 of the trees. And 2/3 of the trees will not use them.

But what if I know that a single variable is probably very important, would it be good to manually increase the probability that this variable be picked in each tree? Is it feasible with the randomForest package in R?


2 Answers 2


Note that mtry is the number of variables randomly sampled as candidates at each split. And from this candidates the best is choosen to perform splitting. Thus the proportion you have mentioned is not satisfied completely. More important variables appear more frequently, and less important – less frequently. So if the variable is really very important, then there is a great probability that it will be picked in a tree and you do not need manual correction. But sometimes (rarely) there is a need to force the presence of some variable (regardless of its possible importance) in the regression. As far as I know R package random forest does not support such possibility. But if this variable has no intercorrelation with others you can make ordinary regression with this variable as single term and then run random forest regression on the residuals of this ordinary regression. If you still want to correct the possibility of choosing prespecified variables, then modification of source code with next compilation is your option.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If you need n trees to get a decent approximation for your target function, but you are looking for variable importance, then you can set something like 5*n or 10*n trees in the forest. They will converge more, not on "fit error" but on change in variable importance. $\endgroup$ Aug 13, 2015 at 21:26

Since June 2015, a new promising RF algorithm on R-CRAN called 'ranger' has this feature. It is tweaked with, split.select.weights: "Numeric vector with weights between 0 and 1, representing the probability to select variables for splitting."


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.