0
$\begingroup$

I am trying to run a two-way repeated measures anova in spss but i think my data needs restructuring. I have run anova's in spss before so i am familiar with process. The problem is that when i have previously run a two-way repeated measures anova it has been using two sets of numerical values (times). In this case i am trying to look for significance between a set of numerical data (times) against what is effectively a categorical variable (as seen in be data outlining below). The version order is a variable (column) and so it appears when i'm defining the anova test within spss.

My issue is that when i define the subject factors and levels within spss:

enter image description here

On the next screen i have to enter all the variables.

enter image description here

But i only have four variables to use.

enter image description here

As you can see from the basic outline of my data at the bottom, the version order is in one variable. I don't have a variable for each order sequence.

I am trying to run the anova to see the effect that the version order had on the total time for each version. I also plan to run an anova to look at the effect the version order had on version performance in each task.

I have 'long' and 'wide' versions of my data

Long:

enter image description here

Wide:

enter image description here

| cite | improve this question | |
$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

I believe i found the solution, a Mixed ANOVA :)

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This is being automatically flagged as low quality, probably because it is so short. At present it is more of a comment than an answer by our standards. Can you expand on it? Why is a mixed ANOVA the solution? $\endgroup$ – gung - Reinstate Monica Aug 17 '18 at 11:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.