5
$\begingroup$

From the output of a logistic regression in JMP, I read about two binary variables:

Var1 estimate -0.1007384
Var2 estimate  0.21528927

and then

Odds ratio for Var1 lev1/lev2 1.2232078 reciprocal 0.8175225
Odds ratio for Var2 lev1/lev2 0.6501329 reciprocal 1.5381471

Now I obtain 1.2232078 as exp(2*0.1007384), and similarly for the other odds ratio.

So, my question is: why I have to multiply by two? Is the relation between a coefficient c and its odds ratio r equal to r=exp(c)? Isn't it?

$\endgroup$
11
$\begingroup$

Ok, I drop a quick response. Your idea is correct in that the regression coefficient is the log of the OR. More precisely, if $b$ is your regression coefficient, $\exp(b)$ is the odds ratio corresponding to a one unit change in your variable. So, to get back to the adjusted odds, you need to know what are the internal coding convention for your factor levels. Usually, for a binary variable it is 0/1 or 1/2. But if it happens that your levels are represented as -1/+1 (which I suspect here), then you have to multiply the regression coefficient by 2 when exponentiating.

The same would apply if you were working with a continuous variable, like age, and want to express the odds for 5 years ($\exp(5b)$) instead of 1 year ($\exp(b)$).

Update: I just found this about JMP coding for nominal variables (version < 7).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.