I would like to know whether there is any condition that using one cluster evaluation methods (Dunn, Silhouette, Davies-Bouldin) is better than others. I didn't find anything online or inside books, except a short descriptions that Dunn index is good for non-convex shaped clusters, but didn't find a proper justification for this claim.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ They will often prefer the same solutions and the differences are supposedly largely a matter of subjective preference. $\endgroup$ – Has QUIT--Anony-Mousse Aug 19 '18 at 9:15
  • $\begingroup$ For non-convex clusters, DBCV may be more appropriate. $\endgroup$ – Has QUIT--Anony-Mousse Aug 19 '18 at 9:19
  • $\begingroup$ Please go to my web-page and read "Clustering criterions" documentation. The three criterions are very different in their "ideology" $\endgroup$ – ttnphns Aug 19 '18 at 10:16

Bolshakova and Azuaje (2003) presents an evaluation between the three cluster validation techniques you mention. Maybe this helps if you haven't seen it.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the paper. I go thought it, and it is domain specific (genome data) I would like to know something in general. $\endgroup$ – Reza Rawassizadeh Aug 19 '18 at 12:16
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, I see. Sorry that I couldn't help, then. $\endgroup$ – Ozan C. Aug 19 '18 at 21:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.