It is a correct remark that a conjugate family of priors for an exponential family of distributions with a two-dimensional parameter $(\theta_1,\theta_2)$ can be defined by three parameters and hence that for a Normal family of distributions
$$f(x|\theta_1,\theta_2)\propto
\exp\left\{\frac{-x^2}{2\theta_2}+\frac{x\theta_1}{\theta_2}-\frac{\theta_1^2}{2\theta_2}-\frac{\log(\theta_2)}{2}\right\}$$
a conjugate family of priors is defined by
$$\pi(\theta_1,\theta_2|\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\lambda)\propto
\exp\left\{\frac{-\alpha_1}{2\theta_2}+\frac{\alpha_2\theta_1}{\theta_2}-\lambda\frac{\theta_1^2}{2\theta_2}-\lambda\frac{\log(\theta_2)}{2}\right\}$$
However it is also possible to defined conjugate priors with more hyperparameters in the sense that priors and posteriors belong to the same family.
In our book Bayesian Essentials with R, we do resort to the four parameter version:
We now consider the general case of an iid sample
$\mathscr{D}_n=(x_1,\ldots,x_n)$ from the normal distribution $\mathscr{N}(\mu,\sigma^2)$ and
$\theta=(\mu,\sigma^2)$. This setting also allows a conjugate prior since the normal distribution remains an exponential family when both parameters are unknown. It is of the form
$$
(\sigma^2)^{-\lambda_\sigma-3/2}\,\exp\left\{-\left(\lambda_\mu(\mu-\xi)^2+\alpha\right)/2\sigma^2\right\}
$$
since
\begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:conjunor}
\pi((\mu,\sigma^2)|\mathscr{D}_n) & \propto & (\sigma^2)^{-\lambda_\sigma-3/2}\,
\exp\left\{-\left(\lambda_\mu (\mu-\xi)^2 + \alpha \right)/2\sigma^2\right\}\nonumber\\
&& \times
(\sigma^2)^{-n/2}\,\exp \left\{-\left(n(\mu-\overline{x})^2 + s_x^2 \right)/2\sigma^2\right\} \\
&\propto& (\sigma^2)^{-\lambda_\sigma(\mathscr{D}_n)}\exp\left\{-\left(\lambda_\mu(\mathscr{D}_n)
(\mu-\xi(\mathscr{D}_n))^2+\alpha(\mathscr{D}_n)\right)/2\sigma^2\right\}\,,\nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
where $s_x^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i-\overline{x})^2$.
Therefore, the conjugate prior on $\theta$ is the product of an inverse gamma
distribution on $\sigma^2$, $\mathscr{IG}(\lambda_\sigma,\alpha/2)$, and,
conditionally on $\sigma^2$, a normal distribution on $\mu$, $\mathscr{N} (\xi,\sigma^2/\lambda_\mu)$.
but there is not particular reason for doing so, except if a different degree of prior precision ($\lambda_\mu\ne\lambda_\sigma$) is available on $\mu$ and on $\sigma$.