I am building regression models to evaluate the effect of several characteristics of genetic variants (my predictors) on a handful of phenotypic parameters (continuous and binary - hence I am building linear and binomial models).
In some cases I am observing that:

  • the p-value for the 'slope coefficient' of predictor Z within the model is not significant (p-value displayed in the output of the summary() function in R


  • when I compare nested models ([A~ X+Y] vs [A~ X+Y+Z]) with a likelihood ratio test, the model containing Z among predictors has a significantly lower residual deviance than one without Z. I do this with the R command:


How should this type of results be interpreted?

In my understanding this means that, when taken into account, predictor Z significantly improves the model's performance. However, I would then also expect the coefficient of Z in the model to be significantly different from 0.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.